Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Falseticker

2011-12-19 Thread Bill Lake
Sorry meant "I believe that you could drop the NTP master on B as this causes confusion in NTP and just use the *NTP server*, On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Bill Lake wrote: > I think you want router B's time to be close to or the same as router A's, > I believe that you could drop the NTP mas

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Falseticker

2011-12-19 Thread Bill Lake
I think you want router B's time to be close to or the same as router A's, I believe that you could drop the NTP master on B as this causes confusion in NTP and just use the NTP master, to ensure the clock is closest to router A on newer routers use the update calendar or manually set time on older

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Falseticker

2011-12-19 Thread romain mullier
Hi Mohammed, Unfortunately I got the same result with the ntp peer. If you get a chance, try it out next time you jump on a proctorlab session and let me know what your findings are Thanks! Romain On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Mohd Baqari wrote: > On RTR B: > > 1. Instead of ntp server you

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Falseticker

2011-12-15 Thread Mohd Baqari
On RTR B: 1. Instead of ntp server you need to use ntp peer 2. You need to enable ntp access-group peer. Do this and lets see the output. Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Dec 16, 2011, at 12:48 AM, romain mullier wrote: > > Hi, > > Can anyone explain which are the circums

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Falseticker

2011-12-15 Thread romain mullier
Hi, Can anyone explain which are the circumstances that make your NTP flagged as falseticker? The requirement is this: Router A is NTP server. Router B synchronizes its clock with router A. If router A is unavailable then Router B uses its own internal clock. So basically Router B can synchroniz