Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-12-01 Thread Divin Mathew John
*Sent:* Saturday, November 26, 2011 10:43 AM *To:* Divin Mathew John *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Priyank Kiran *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior** ** ** ** Divin is right. MTP doesnt support connecting to a multicast stream, so it would make

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-30 Thread Priyank Kiran
Kiran *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior*** * ** ** Divin is right. MTP doesnt support connecting to a multicast stream, so it would make sense CUCM converts it to a unicast stream. On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Divin Mathew John divinj

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-26 Thread Robert Thomas
Divin is right. MTP doesnt support connecting to a multicast stream, so it would make sense CUCM converts it to a unicast stream. On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Divin Mathew John divinj...@gmail.comwrote: I think this is normal behaviour. MULTICAST MOH cannot go thru MTP. as in the MTP

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-25 Thread Ashraf Ayyash
I Got real case for the same issue but longtime ago , cannot remember 100% what i have done on it can you please collect ccm sdi sdl and IPVMS detailed traces for the both calls ? I will may take a look when i will have Chance to , but i also need to know why you have enabled the MTP first place

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-25 Thread Divin Mathew John
I think this is normal behaviour. MULTICAST MOH cannot go thru MTP. as in the MTP cannot re-originate the stream. CUCM uses Unicast MOH instead. At least in the lab scenario, try not to check MTP box. On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com wrote: I Got real case for

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-24 Thread Priyank Kiran
Experts, Need help understanding the following behavior conceptually - Have the subscriber as dedicated MOH multicast server incrementing on port with default address 239.1.1.1 port 16384 Remote H323 gateway, with local music-on-hold wav file spoofing the above source address. This works as

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-24 Thread datucha123 datucha123
What codec are you using for normal Voice calls? is it G729? If yes, then I have the following on my mind: Look, when we use G729 for Voice Calls, and then try to hold the PSTN phone, then the gateway need to connect to MoH with G711, as the Routers Flash MoH file is G711 only. And in your

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-24 Thread datucha123 datucha123
And what's the Regiong settings between the GW to MoH and and GW to IP Phones? If everything is G711, then maybe the Multicast cannot traverse the MTP? On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Priyank Kiran priyank.ki...@gmail.comwrote: Using G711. The region setting b/w the MOH server DP and phone

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-24 Thread Priyank Kiran
I think that is exactly what I am getting at after all the observations - perhaps multicast cannot traverse the MTP and that is where I would like to understand the reasoning behind it. Everything is set at G711 with my setup. On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:08 PM, datucha123 datucha123

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-24 Thread Mohd Baqari
What is the MRGL assigned to the device pool of your MTP. Is it the same MoH multicast MRGL. Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Nov 24, 2011, at 9:50 PM, Priyank Kiran priyank.ki...@gmail.com wrote: Experts, Need help understanding the following behavior conceptually -

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-24 Thread Priyank Kiran
No it's not, have 2 MRGLs 1) MRGL attached to DP of gateway and MTP are same mrgl-siteXX mrg-moh + mrg-mtp-siteXX 2) MRGL attached to DP of MoH server mrgl-moh mrg-moh Would like to point out that I only have 1 muticast source and server in my cluster which has been bound to mrg-moh. On

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need help understanding this behavior

2011-11-24 Thread Priyank Kiran
It does On Thursday, November 24, 2011, Mohd Baqari baqari.voic...@gmail.com wrote: The MRGL of MTP should have MoH multicast. Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Nov 25, 2011, at 1:57 AM, Priyank Kiran priyank.ki...@gmail.com wrote: No it's not, have 2 MRGLs 1) MRGL