Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS Quetsion - FRTS

2008-03-25 Thread Paul and Bobs
I though the 95% took into account the clocking On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Jonathan Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But a T1 is really 1.536M (8kb is for clocking), so, it should be 1.4592M > > > > Jonathan > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Onur Tufekci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS Quetsion - FRTS

2008-03-25 Thread Jonathan Charles
But a T1 is really 1.536M (8kb is for clocking), so, it should be 1.4592M Jonathan On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Onur Tufekci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is best practice to follow as stated in the QOS SRND to use 95% of the > bandwidth. And the bc should be set up according to that so t

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS Quetsion - FRTS

2008-03-25 Thread Onur Tufekci
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/home/home.htm voice/telephony IP Telephony Solution Reference Network Design Guides http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/netsol/ns432/c649/ccmigration_09186a008049b062.pdf

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS Quetsion - FRTS

2008-03-25 Thread Onur Tufekci
It is best practice to follow as stated in the QOS SRND to use 95% of the bandwidth. And the bc should be set up according to that so the delay is correct. On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > HI > > > Can someone explain to me the reason on a 1544 Kbps link

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS Quetsion - FRTS

2008-03-25 Thread Paul and Bobs
and does anyone kow where to find the QOS SRND through the univercd Cheers Guys Paul

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS Quetsion - FRTS

2008-03-25 Thread Paul and Bobs
HI Can someone explain to me the reason on a 1544 Kbps link the FRTS cir is set to 1466800 and bc set to 14668 Paul