ilipp
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question about route lists and mixing MGCP
+H323 route groups
Did you wait enough time for the h323 call to fail before it kicked over to
the MGCP gateway entry? I remember it taking a while. I can try it later
tonight. Also, what do your trace files indica
, 2009 10:48 PM
To: Nara Shikamaru
Cc: OSL Group; GRAFL Philipp
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question about route lists and mixing MGCP
+H323 route groups
Did you wait enough time for the h323 call to fail before it kicked over to the
MGCP gateway entry? I remember it taking a while. I can try
2:27 PM
To: Michael Ciarfello
Cc: GRAFL Philipp; OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question about route lists and mixing MGCP
+H323 route groups
The detail for this setting states that it's for ICT calls, so I don't know if
it will work for this particular issue. I've wor
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Nara Shikamaru
> *Sent:* Friday, July 10, 2009 12:56 PM
> *To:* GRAFL Philipp
> *Cc:* OSL Group
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question about route lists and mixing
>
me.)
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 12:56 PM
To: GRAFL Philipp
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question about route lists and mixing MGCP
+H323 route groups
Sorry,
ted number flag =
> false.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *Im Auftrag von *Nara Shikamaru
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 09. Juli 2009 18:08
> *An:* OSL Group
> *Betreff:* [OSL | CCIE_Vo
] Question about route lists and mixing MGCP
+H323 route groups
I'm working on a situation whereby a route list has two route groups,
each contain end points with different call controls. Primary is H323,
secondary is MGCP. I've run into an unfortunate shortcoming that I hope
I'm wr
I'm working on a situation whereby a route list has two route groups, each
contain end points with different call controls. Primary is H323, secondary
is MGCP. I've run into an unfortunate shortcoming that I hope I'm wrong
abount. In order to get calls routed to the second route group in the lis
