gt;>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.69.66.253:5060;branch=z9hG4bKyHFdoT6xNYZ85fvOD9z4kQ~~1
>>>>> From: ;tag=ds3be1f82d
>>>>> To: ;tag=3BF3A8-1459
>>>>> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 03:12:15 GMt
>>>>> Call-ID: c234c79-1100@sip:4002@10.69.66.2
3 expires 3600 port 5060 transport udp
>> unsolicited
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> gatekeeper
>> shutdown
>> !
>> !
>> telephony-service
>> srst mode auto-provision all****
>> srst ephone template 1****
>&g
; mwi relay
> max-conferences 8 gain -6
> transfer-system full-consult****
> transfer-pattern .T
> secondary-dialtone 9
> create cnf-files version-stamp Jan 01 2002 00:00:00
> ** **
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
> mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@o
;> srst ephone template 1
>> srst dn template 1
>> srst dn line-mode octo
>> max-ephones 30
>> max-dn 30 no-reg both
>> ip source-address 10.69.66.254 port 2000
>> time-zone 42
>> voicemail 4220
>> mwi relay
>> max-conferences 8 gain -6
>>
] On Behalf Of William Bell
Sent: Πέμπτη, 21 Φεβρουαρίου 2013 8:29 πμ
To: Leslie Meade
Cc: ccie_voice
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Questions regarding Unified CME as SRST
Leslie/Steve/Jason,
What are your thoughts on pre-configuring ephone-dns when you are permitted to
use CME-SRST with
t
> transfer-pattern .T
> secondary-dialtone 9
> create cnf-files version-stamp Jan 01 2002 00:00:00
>
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Steve Keller
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:23 PM
Steve Keller
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:23 PM
To: Jason Lee
Cc: ccie_voice
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Questions regarding Unified CME as SRST
Well i confirmed today that if using a CUCM->CUE integration at a branch site,
th you will want to setup your MWI to be subscribe/notify w
Well i confirmed today that if using a CUCM->CUE integration at a branch
site, th you will want to setup your MWI to be subscribe/notify when you
complete your CUE integratoin with CUCM. MWI works great when registered to
CUCM and using CUE for VM. When the site fails over in to srst mode and
your
I typically use unsolicited on my SRST sites for MWI, but you may be on to
something. Maybe this method would be preferred. All depends what they
are looking for! Thus begins my tangent ;o)
I've seen the same behavior with the + as Bill.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 19, 2013, at 9:55 PM, Will
I have been setting up my CUE to use outcalling/unsolicited for MWI when
doing the integration with UCM. Using the sip-server/unsolicited command
gets my mwi working for subsequent voicemails, but the phone is definately
not subscribing, so it can get updated MWI as it becomes registered
locally. I
Jason,
I have recently been toying with the idea of pre-building my ephone-dns for
scenarios where a site is a CME-SRST site and I am allowed to use autoprovision
dn or all. I like to build out my entire config in notepad before pasting it in
and I like to fine tune the ephone-dns before they a
Steve,
Jason's response is spot on for your first question. Though, I have found the
integration to be a little flaky myself. But that was a recent observation when
I was trying pre-build ephone-dns before swinging a site to CME.
In regards to your second question, I don't think the phone is d
Steve,
I think that if you set up Subscribe Notify for MWI instead of Unsolicited
Notify it might preserve the light. In order to get that to work you would
have had to load the phones into SRST (auto provision all) at least once so
that they populate the running config. You can then configure t
Recently i have noticed a few things in my lab as i have been preparing for
the lab exam.
Using CME as SRST specifically in this situation, i have been trying to
"preserve" as much features and appearance as i can when my UCM phones
register to the gateway.
Two scenarios i have question on because
14 matches
Mail list logo
