Matthew,
Thank you for giving me the closure I needed for the next step. Now I can
say with conviction that Call Routing is "in my blood!"
I still got long ways until March...
Thanks again
*Emanuel Damasceno*
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Matthew Saskin wrote:
> Route group manipulation
Route group manipulations that occur within route list membership are for
that route list only.
As an example, if I have the following RL/RG's
RL-HQ: RG-HQ
RL-BR1: RG-BR1
RL-BR2: RG-BR2
RL-HQ-BR1-TEHO: RG-BR1 (**), RG-SLRG
I can make calling party modifications in the RG-BR1 denoted with (**)
wi
Hello Experts,
I was labbing this weekend (Lab 5A IPExpert), and I started trying out
things to clarify any doubts I would have. I didn't have enough time on my
sessions to try this out, and I am wondering if you guys can give me any
input on this.
I create route groups for HQ (RG-HQ), and BR1 (R
inestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cristobal
Priego
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 8:59 AM
To: CCIE STUDENT
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm
the reason why i am asking is because in the lab they're not that specific
2011/6/22
>
>> You rarely even do it in the real world
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Randall Saborio
>> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:26:24
>> To:
>> Cc:
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm
>>
>> Can you name w
the reason why i am asking is because in the lab they're not that specific
2011/6/22 CCIE STUDENT
> You rarely even do it in the real world
> -Original Message-
> From: Randall Saborio
> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:26:24
> To:
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [OSL
You rarely even do it in the real world
-Original Message-
From: Randall Saborio
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:26:24
To:
Cc:
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm
Can you name when on the lab would you ever configure two devices on same route
group?
I don&#
Can you name when on the lab would you ever configure two devices on same
route group?
I don't think this is ever done on the lab. Even if it did, its not a matter
of preference, but a matter of matching the task requirements.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Cristobal Priego wrote:
> guys,
>
>
Cris,
I think circular is better. If you use top-down , outgoing calls will never
use 2nd device & difficult to find out whether outgoing calls are working
well through it.
Dave
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Cristobal Priego wrote:
> guys,
>
> for the lab, whenever you configure your route
guys,
for the lab, whenever you configure your route groups
which distribution algorithm is better
circular or top down
i use top down all the time, but i'd like to know your opinion on this
thanks
___
For more information regarding industry leading
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles
> [jonv...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 12:46 PM
> To: Tony Tong
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Route Group
>
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Route Group
That's weird.
This was the exact question from Vol 2 Lab 3...
Jonathan
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Tony Tong wrote:
> Hi, Perhaps someone can help me with this. I tried to create a route group
> and found none o
That's weird.
This was the exact question from Vol 2 Lab 3...
Jonathan
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Tony Tong wrote:
> Hi, Perhaps someone can help me with this. I tried to create a route group
> and found none of my created gateways/trunks listed. not sure why?
>
> Rgds,
>
> Tony
> __
unday, August 30, 2009 4:52 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Route Group
Hi, Perhaps someone can help me with this. I tried to create a route group
and found none of my created gateways/trunks listed. not sure why?
Rgds,
Hi, Perhaps someone can help me with this. I tried to create a route group
and found none of my created gateways/trunks listed. not sure why?
Rgds,
Tony
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.co
;
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Jose Linero Welcker
> *Sent:* Saturday, February 16, 2008 10:48 AM
> *To:* ccievoice1; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Cc:* CCIE Maillist; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ro
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Route Group Failover
Hmm,
Just to reconfirm,
Route pattern of 521
-->Route List
--> H323 route group
-->siteb h323 gateway
--> 6608 route group
--> 6608 pri gateway
So, if call to 521 failed on first route group, it
a null interface on a h323 gateway.
>
> ip route 10.5.200.21 255.255.255.0 null
>
>
> JD
>
>
> --
> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 00:49:48 +0800
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; [EMAIL PROT
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [OSL |
CCIE_Voice] Route Group Failovergo to channel t1 0/0/0 and issue a shutdown
On Feb 17, 2008 12:47 AM, Jose Linero Welcker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi: Yes that is the way it shoul
> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:23:52 +0800
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Route Group Failover
>
> Hmm,
>
> Just to reconfirm,
>
you simulating the
outage, turn the E1 down?, turn the gateway down?
Regards,
Jose
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:23:52 +0800From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
PROTECTED]: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Route Group FailoverHmm,Just to
869
> Sent from my BlackBerry device
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jose Linero Welcker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:51:58
> To:"boonchin .ng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:CCIE Maillist
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Route Gr
at, 16 Feb 2008 13:51:58
To:"boonchin .ng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:CCIE Maillist
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Route Group Failover
Hi
How are you doing the test?, could you post the h323 debug.
Regards,
Jose
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:42:36 +0800
e: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:42:36 +0800
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Route Group Failover
>
>
> In the RG.
>
> I did test calling the particular destination number to specific route
> group
Hi
How are you doing the test?, could you post the h323 debug.
Regards,
Jose
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:42:36 +0800From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Route Group FailoverIn
the RG.I did test calling the particular destination number to
?
>
> Regards,
>
> Jose
>
>
> --
> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:38:12 +0800
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Route Group Failover
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have created 2 Route List: *RL_HQ_Local* and *RL_Site
Hi:
No there is not an specific requirement, where are you doing the digit
manipulation, in the RP or in the RG?
Regards,
Jose
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:38:12 +0800From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Route Group FailoverHi all,I have created 2
Route List
Hi all,
I have created 2 Route List: *RL_HQ_Local* and *RL_SiteB_Local
*Within the RL_HQ_Local, I have:
RG_6608 --> 6608 T1 PRI Gateway (1st priority)
RG_H323 --> H323 T1 PRI Gateway (2nd priority)
Within the RL_SiteB_Local, I have
RG_H323 --> H323 T1 PRI Gateway (1st priority)
RG_6608 -->
28 matches
Mail list logo
