Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QoS - Vol.2 Lab 8 Q5.3

2010-05-07 Thread Peter Weeks
ergio Polizer [mailto:spoli...@hotmail.com] Sent: 7. mai 2010 13:32 To: Peter Weeks; ccievoi...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QoS - Vol.2 Lab 8 Q5.3 Peter, Thank you for your input. By the way, I always wanted to know what are the 5 columns fo

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QoS - Vol.2 Lab 8 Q5.3

2010-05-07 Thread Sergio Polizer
On Behalf Of Mad Kiwi Sent: 6. mai 2010 23:49 To: Sergio Polizer Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QoS - Vol.2 Lab 8 Q5.3 Thanks Sergio, That's what is was struggling to find last night. Regards Kiwi On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 7:32 AM,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QoS - Vol.2 Lab 8 Q5.3

2010-05-06 Thread Peter Weeks
: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QoS - Vol.2 Lab 8 Q5.3 Thanks Sergio, That's what is was struggling to find last night. Regards Kiwi On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Sergio Polizer mailto:spoli...@hotmail.com>> wrote: Hi, This is the expect

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QoS - Vol.2 Lab 8 Q5.3

2010-05-06 Thread Mad Kiwi
> -- > Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 21:40:17 +1000 > From: ccievoi...@gmail.com > To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QoS - Vol.2 Lab 8 Q5.3 > > > Hi everyone, > > I'm working through the HQ (3750) Switch QO

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QoS - Vol.2 Lab 8 Q5.3

2010-05-06 Thread Sergio Polizer
e not supported, and the statistics shown in the display should be ignored. " HTH, Sergio. Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 21:40:17 +1000 From: ccievoi...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QoS - Vol.2 Lab 8 Q5.3 Hi everyone, I'm working through the H

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch QoS - Vol.2 Lab 8 Q5.3

2010-05-06 Thread Mad Kiwi
Hi everyone, I'm working through the HQ (3750) Switch QOS lab, where we use AutoQos, should I be able to see packet classification under the "show policy-map interface" statement? As far as I can tell straight out of the box Auto QoS isn't matching the packets. Any thoughts? -- Cheers, kiwi _