well, ok
i can see that.
but would it be wrong if you did it in 5.3 because it is not mentioned as
restriction ?
5.2 i read it as only for the HQ site
generaly, i find the questions sometimes "cloudy"
> I believe it's because of the previous question, 5.2 . You did not do any
> trusting on
I believe it's because of the previous question, 5.2 . You did not do any
trusting on the switch, instead of remarked all of the packets at the switch
level; therefore, you were able to trust anything that eventurally got to
the HQ router. Whereas on BR2, nothing could be done at the switch level
question on 5.3
HQ - BR2 solution
i can't find the reason for the following.
on HQ auto qos voip trust fr-atm is used.
on BR2 aout qos voip fr-atm is used
why is the "trust" option not used on BR2 ?
what am i missing in the question/solution.
Ron
