Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 2 typos

2011-11-11 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
] Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 10:56 PM To: John McGaughey (jomcgaug); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 2 typos Did you configure the calling party transform pattern? \.+44.! predot/prefix 0? At least in other labs with similar question this was part

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 2 typos

2011-11-11 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of John McGaughey (jomcgaug) Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 6:04 AM To: edgar feliz; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 2 typos I configured the calling

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 2 typos

2011-11-10 Thread John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
Is it just me or is Workbook 2 full of mistakes? For example, I'm in lab 5 question 2.3. It says calls from phone button 2 should appear in the history logs as +44 020 5943 2785. The answer states to set the Subscriber Number Prefix to +44. That's incorrect since the call comes in like

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 2 typos

2011-11-10 Thread edgar feliz
out from the missed calls with + dialing. Edgar From: John McGaughey (jomcgaug) jomcg...@cisco.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 11:07 PM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 2 typos Is it just me or is Workbook 2 full