Wouldn't be the first time :-)
CCIE OSL wrote:
I hope, you are not dreaming about it!
/Jin Jung...
Chris Parker wrote:
Cliff,
This looks great I will try it out tonight. Been thinking about this
all day too but my pesky job has been keeping me busy ... :-)
Good work
Chris
Cliff
It's not needed to accomplish this. But if told to use it to accomplish
some other requirementmaybe.
It would just depend.
- Original Message -
From: "CCIE OSL"
To: "Cliff McGlamry"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_V
I hope, you are not dreaming about it!
/Jin Jung...
Chris Parker wrote:
Cliff,
This looks great I will try it out tonight. Been thinking about this
all day too but my pesky job has been keeping me busy ... :-)
Good work
Chris
Cliff McGlamry wrote:
This bugged me. I kept thinking
Cliff,
This looks great I will try it out tonight. Been thinking about this
all day too but my pesky job has been keeping me busy ... :-)
Good work
Chris
Cliff McGlamry wrote:
This bugged me. I kept thinking about it.
Went back and started googling for some additional gatekeeper
documen
Hey, Cliff,
Man!
First, Thanks for all you time on this.
I see your method, and it's wonderful that this works..
One question,
Let's say, if you are allow to use bandwidth command on Gk, would you
use same method??
bandwidth interzone 16
/Jin Jung...
Cliff McGlamry wrote:
This bugged me. I
This bugged me. I kept thinking about it.
Went back and started googling for some additional gatekeeper documentation.
Found what I was looking for. To summarize the problem as I understand it:
1. Trunks coming in from CCM to GK. Trunk to sub is priority for incoming
calls from GK.
2.