Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - follow up - ACTUAL SOLUTION

2009-03-31 Thread Cliff McGlamry
This bugged me. I kept thinking about it. Went back and started googling for some additional gatekeeper documentation. Found what I was looking for. To summarize the problem as I understand it: 1. Trunks coming in from CCM to GK. Trunk to sub is priority for incoming calls from GK.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - follow up - ACTUAL SOLUTION

2009-03-31 Thread CCIE OSL
Hey, Cliff, Man! First, Thanks for all you time on this. I see your method, and it's wonderful that this works.. One question, Let's say, if you are allow to use bandwidth command on Gk, would you use same method?? bandwidth interzone 16 /Jin Jung... Cliff McGlamry wrote: This bugged me.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - follow up - ACTUAL SOLUTION

2009-03-31 Thread Chris Parker
Cliff, This looks great I will try it out tonight. Been thinking about this all day too but my pesky job has been keeping me busy ... :-) Good work Chris Cliff McGlamry wrote: This bugged me. I kept thinking about it. Went back and started googling for some additional gatekeeper

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - follow up - ACTUAL SOLUTION

2009-03-31 Thread CCIE OSL
I hope, you are not dreaming about it! /Jin Jung... Chris Parker wrote: Cliff, This looks great I will try it out tonight. Been thinking about this all day too but my pesky job has been keeping me busy ... :-) Good work Chris Cliff McGlamry wrote: This bugged me. I kept thinking

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - follow up - ACTUAL SOLUTION

2009-03-31 Thread Chris Parker
Wouldn't be the first time :-) CCIE OSL wrote: I hope, you are not dreaming about it! /Jin Jung... Chris Parker wrote: Cliff, This looks great I will try it out tonight. Been thinking about this all day too but my pesky job has been keeping me busy ... :-) Good work Chris