Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ip rsvp 112 or ip rsvp 160

2012-06-09 Thread Vik Malhi
112 is the right answer not 160z -- Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 Managing Partner / Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 On Jun 9, 2012, at 14:16, "Jason Aarons (AM)" wrote: > Vic has some examples where he indicates to al

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ip rsvp 112 or ip rsvp 160

2012-06-09 Thread Jason Aarons (AM)
Vic has some examples where he indicates to allow 4 G729s call thru rsvp to use "ip rsvp 160", yet the SRND "shows ip rsvp 112" I can see if you want ring-in on 4 G.729 calls you would need 160. But 3 G.729 calls connected and then 1 ring-in would be 112. If I asked you to allow 4 calls in wou