Exactly correct.
From: Kamran Ahsanullah
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 11:58 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] overlapping dialpeer in ccm problem
Thanks Cliff, I understood the flipping, how is the flipping/altering done,
translation pattern
Thanks Cliff, I understood the flipping, how is the flipping/altering done,
translation pattern with no transform mask?
thanks
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:17:56 -0400
> From: "Cliff McGlamry"
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] overlapping dialpeer in ccm
t.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] overlapping dialpeer in ccm problem
Cliff,
first of all good luck in your exam, fingers crossed for you buddy!
Secondly can you explain this line to me in abit more detail please
" Then we had another, much more specific pattern 2[12]00X that
;t or there is a competing
> "thou shalt not" in another part of the exam.
>
> Hope this helps. I'm off to San Jose tomorrow for my crack at the lab on
> Wednesday.
>
> Cliff
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: jeremy co
> To: ccie_voice@onlinest
an Jose tomorrow for my crack at the lab on
Wednesday.
Cliff
- Original Message -
From: jeremy co
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 7:50 AM
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] overlapping dialpeer in ccm problem
Hi,
I have to pattern in CCM tha
As a rule I go int RP report regularly and delete unassigned numbers.
Not sure of that works withTP, but would assume so
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Jun 29, 2009, at 8:29 AM, jeremy co wrote:
solved,
CCM didn't delete my previous configs ,although I delete TP, It was
solved,
CCM didn't delete my previous configs ,although I delete TP, It was still
could be seen in Dial plan report.
Anybody know a good way to make CCM clean up mess like this, that u delete
sth but it's still in dial plan report?
restarting ccm service didn't help
Any idea ?
On Mon, Jun 29
Hi,
I have to pattern in CCM that overlap and mess up my configs.
[23]xxx -> translate unallocated numbers to CTI and then forward it to
unity
2[23]xxx > Direct VM
problem is since first one has less digits it would match , no matter how
much I narrow down second one , like if I change
