Can you name when on the lab would you ever configure two devices on same
route group?
I don't think this is ever done on the lab. Even if it did, its not a matter
of preference, but a matter of matching the task requirements.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Cristobal Priego
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm
Can you name when on the lab would you ever configure two devices on same
route group?
I don't think this is ever done on the lab. Even if it did, its not a
matter of preference, but a matter
STUDENT cciefo...@hotmail.com
You rarely even do it in the real world
-Original Message-
From: Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:26:24
To: cristobalpri...@gmail.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution
] On Behalf Of Cristobal
Priego
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 8:59 AM
To: CCIE STUDENT
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm
the reason why i am asking is because in the lab they're not that specific
2011/6/22 CCIE STUDENT cciefo
guys,
for the lab, whenever you configure your route groups
which distribution algorithm is better
circular or top down
i use top down all the time, but i'd like to know your opinion on this
thanks
___
For more information regarding industry
Cris,
I think circular is better. If you use top-down , outgoing calls will never
use 2nd device difficult to find out whether outgoing calls are working
well through it.
Dave
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com
wrote:
guys,
for the lab, whenever
