Re: [ccp4bb] H32 use

2008-10-28 Thread Eleanor Dodson
I thought H 32 was a PDB requirement? CCP4 programs take a belt-and-braces approach - read the symbol but also check the cell dimensions and set up symmetry accordingly.. But it is a pain if headers are inconsistent with PDB deposition requirements - des anyone know more details? Eleanor

Re: [ccp4bb] buster-tnt on OSX ?

2008-10-28 Thread Kay Diederichs
Clemens Vonrhein schrieb: ... A nice task would be to compare different integration/scaling packages at various stages: for finding the sites e.g. in SHELXD and separately (using known sites) for giving best phases e.g. in SHARP. there could be differences. Yes, maybe it is finally time to

[ccp4bb] Comparison of Integration Programs (was: Re: [ccp4bb] buster-tnt on OSX ?)

2008-10-28 Thread Winter, G (Graeme)
Hi Folks, The idea of comparing different data reduction packages is an interesting one. It is not however without challenges as alluded to by Kay. As far as I can see there are two main challenges - the first is that different users when given the same tools will do different things - in

Re: [ccp4bb] about the PEG molecules in crystals

2008-10-28 Thread Dalibor Milic
Dear Jiamu! Have a look at http://dx.doi.org/10.1524/zksu.2006.suppl_23.613. It might help you. Regards, Dalibor -- Dalibor Milic Laboratory of General and Inorganic Chemistry Department of Chemistry Faculty of Science University of Zagreb Horvatovac 102a HR-1 Zagreb Croatia phone: +385

Re: [ccp4bb] H32 use

2008-10-28 Thread Ian Tickle
Seems to me the sensible approach is the systematic H-M symbol defined in syminfo.lib, i.e. the first letter is always the centring symbol (PIRFABCH) and then if there's any ambiguity the basis can be indicated with a : appendage, so R3:H or R3:R etc, then H3 et al is reserved for H-centred P3 et

Re: [ccp4bb] about the PEG molecules in crystals

2008-10-28 Thread Bernhard Rupp
biochemical features of PEG? They give you the runs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyethylene_glycol BR

Re: [ccp4bb] buster-tnt on OSX ?

2008-10-28 Thread Pete Meyer
Gerard, Thank you very much for clearing that up. It's always good to hear that there's one less things I need to worry about. Pete Gerard Bricogne wrote: Dear Pete, Thank you for your message. I can confirm that you need not worry about this clause: it is meant to prohibit the

Re: [ccp4bb] SUMMARY refmac newligand noexit?

2008-10-28 Thread Pete Meyer
Looks like this was a combination of new atom names, and using on older version of refmac. Thanks to Garib, a combination of using the new dictionaries and refmac 5.6 does the trick. Pete Pete Meyer wrote: Thanks for the quick reply. I got the noexit option for the ccp4-6.0.2 html, so you