peter hudson wrote:
Hello all
I superposed the two different chain, which are two different subunits
of the same structure which are different in conformation with two
differen t programmes.
1) First is with O, with LSQ command, it gives the RMSD values for
different chain is 1.5A for 108
CALL FOR ESRF SYNCHROTRON BEAM TIME WITH ONLINE
DEHUMIDIFIER AT BEAMLINE ID14-2
Proposal Submission Deadline: 20th July 2009
Beamtime will be available in two periods of three days
Hi Peter,
you can also try superposition option in phenix:
phenix.superpose_pdbs [pdb_file_fixed] [pdb_file_moving] [parameter_file]
where optionally you can provide atom selections for "fixed" and "moving".
Pavel.
On 7/5/09 12:33 AM, peter hudson wrote:
Hello all
I superposed the two dif
Peter,
Depending on the method implemented in one software or another - I wouldn't
be surprised if some of them fall into local minima during gradient
optimization for best fit. Depending on how you define the region of
interest, there may also be ambiguity with respect to pair definition - thi
Hello all
I superposed the two different chain, which are two different subunits of
the same structure which are different in conformation with two differen t
programmes.
1) First is with O, with LSQ command, it gives the RMSD values for different
chain is 1.5A for 108 ca atoms.
2) Second program
