On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Katherine Donovan <
katherine.dono...@pg.canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
> *PHENIX – XTRIAGE*
> * *One possible pseudo merohedral twin operator
> 2-fold axis
> h, -k, -h-l
>
> /**2 = 2.032
> **2/ = 0.787
> <|E**2-1|> = 0.734
> <|L|>, = 0.490, 0.321
> Multivariate Z scor
On 7/22/13 11:20 PM, Ethan Merritt wrote:
Which brings up the point that something seems to have
gone wrong in one of your processing runs.
Both runs claim mean (I/sigI) in the outer shell is 2.0,
but in one case this is for the 2.4A shell and in the other case
it's for the 2.2A shell. That is
On Monday, 22 July 2013, Katherine Donovan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a data set that was collected to about 2.2A, which I have processed in
> either P21 (to 2.4 A) or C2221 (2.25A).
So I'm confused.
You may not know what the spacegroup is, but you are processing
the same spots either way. Why
Hi,
The density in both space groups looks very similar, with no obvious
differences.
The data was processed in XDS followed by refinement in REFMAC and then PHENIX.
Yes, the statistics of the orthorhombic structure is probably more realistic.
But when both are refined in REFMAC these statistic
Hi All,
I have a data set that was collected to about 2.2A, which I have processed in
either P21 (to 2.4 A) or C2221 (2.25A).
I am unsure which space group is more correct.
I have a higher symmetry space group with higher resolution and average
statistics or a lower symmetry space group with l
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Stefan Gajewski wrote:
> The maps shows signs of over fitting, the B-factors do not look correct in
> my opinion.
What do "correct" B-factors look like? What refinement strategy did you
use for them?
> Note that the R-free value in the 3.4A shell is lower tha
Dear Stefan,
clearly a 3.4 potentially 3.3A dataset. Rmerge is just high because of
your multiplicity.
As long as Rpim (all) stays well below 50% you are fine.
Stunning you have identical values between "all" vs "within". This is
usually not the case.
bye,
Matthias
Hey!
I was reading a lot lately on data processing and the ongoing debate in the
community on how to submit "Table 1".
Here is an example of medium resolution data integrated with XDS, merged in
SCALA and preliminarily refined in phenix.
Overall InnerShe
Hi,
We are looking for highly motivated crystallographer, preferably fresh PhD
graduate for the position of Research Fellow in the Experimental Therapeutic
Centre, Agency for Science and Technology Research, Singapore. The centre
focuses on drug-discovery research and the candidate will be pri
Dear all,
I would like to remind you on a workshop on "The Future of Microfocus Protein
Crystallography" which will take place at the MAX IV User meeting on the 24th
and the 25th of September, 2013, in Lund, Sweden.
Recent developments within protein crystallography methods in combination with
10 matches
Mail list logo
