[ccp4bb] CCP4-JHBuild: how to build both static and shared libs?

Is there a JHBuild setting for requesting both static and shared libs? The default seems to only build *.so(s) and setting _build_static=True in conf.py only yields *.a(s). Thanks, Alastair Fyfe

[ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] emergency substitute for RT loop cover?

You might try some shrink-wrap. Herman -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von Keller, Jacob Gesendet: Montag, 7. Juli 2014 18:43 An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] emergency substitute for RT loop cover? Anyone

[ccp4bb] off topic: Crystallization robots

In the process of acquiring a crystallography robot for the laboratory. I have narrowed along capability and budgetary constraints to either an Formulatrix NT8, or a Art Robbins Gryphon. I know the Art Robbins instrument characteristics pretty well, does anyone have any experience/advice on the

[ccp4bb] Gentle reminder, early Bird Registration deadline ICCBM15 in Hamburg

Gentle reminder, early bird registrations deadline, July 15th, is approaching fast. Students, postdocs and scientists interested in the latest crystal-growth methodologies and advances in serial crystallography, neutron diffraction and other exciting techniques may wish to *join ICCBM15*

[ccp4bb] WG: Murnau conference on Structural Biology

Dear colleagues, I would like to remind you that registration for the Murnau conference on Structural Biology will end soon (July 31st). At the meeting from September 10 to 13, we will have eminent scientist as speakers from various fields of structural biology (see

[ccp4bb] question about powder diffraction

Hi If a sample of powder crystal (say Nickel) is shot with monochromatic x-rays, one will observe reflections from planes that satisfy Bragg's Law. For Ni the first four planes are (111, 200, 202, 311) with 2theta (44, 52, 76, 93 degrees) respectively. Why doesn't one observe a reflection

Re: [ccp4bb] question about powder diffraction

The plane will scatter, and all atoms in the plane will scatter in phase if angle of incidence equals angle of reflection. this is how a mirror reflects. Furthermore all the parallel planes will also reflect at this angle. Trouble is the beams scattered from the different parallel planes are

Re: [ccp4bb] question about powder diffraction

Edward A. Berry ber...@upstate.edu writes: The plane will scatter, and all atoms in the plane will scatter in phase if angle of incidence equals angle of reflection. this is how a mirror reflects. Furthermore all the parallel planes will also reflect at this angle. Trouble is the beams

Re: [ccp4bb] question about powder diffraction

Yes, the way I like to think of it as a double condition, the reflection‐in‐a‐mirror condition *plus* the special condition imposed by Bragg’s Law. This is why I often prefer the unfashionable spelling “reflexion”. -- Ian ◎ Me too. Actually reflexion (but the verb is reflect) is the

Re: [ccp4bb] question about powder diffraction

I thought (I think I was told that way early during my PhD studies) that reflexion/reflection is a matter of British/American spelling. In fact Merriam-Webster Dictionary says just that: Definition ofREFLEXION chiefly British variant ofreflection and the American Heritage and

Re: [ccp4bb] question about powder diffraction

Dear all, The downstream end of this thread seems to have drifted into learned considerations of spelling, so I am getting back to this early reply. I am surprised that nobody has mentioned the role of the wavelength in all this: there is no way that one can directly link the first