Hi Mark
This tells you how to do it:
https://www.wwpdb.org/deposition/PDBxDeposit
Cheers
-- Ian
On Sat, 30 Oct 2021, 00:04 Mark J. van Raaij,
wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> this may be something simple but I can’t find it in the CCP4i GUI or
> online.
> Is there a keyword to make refmac output
sorry, you can ignore my question.
The mmcif file is output all along, for some reason I had never noticed it.
how stupid of me...
Mark J van Raaij
Dpto de Estructura de Macromoleculas
Centro Nacional de Biotecnologia - CSIC
calle Darwin 3
E-28049 Madrid, Spain
Section Editor Acta
Dear All,
this may be something simple but I can’t find it in the CCP4i GUI or online.
Is there a keyword to make refmac output the coordinates as a cif file instead
of a pdb file - or better, as both?
Or is it some other program that converts the formats?
Mark J van Raaij
Dpto de Estructura de
The Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine is seeking Two Protein Expression,
Purification, and Crystallization Experts with an open rank for PostDoc,
Research Associate, or Senior Research Associate to participate in a Structural
Genomics Research Center addressing important biochemical
We are looking for a postdoctoral candidate with experience in single-particle
cryo-EM and willingness to learn virology and immunology.
Ph.D. in Biochemistry, Biophysics or a related discipline is required.
Tomography (cryo-ET) experience is an asset but not a pre-requisite.
The Bajic lab uses
Dear All,
We are organizing the second part of the workshop series on 'Sample
preparation of membrane proteins*'* along with the Lund Institute Of
Advanced Neutron And X-Ray Science (LINXS).
In our first online workshop in May 2021, we discussed several aspects of
expression systems, protein
Well, of all the possible metrics you could use to asses data quality
Rfree is probably the worst one. This is because it is a
cross-validation metric, and cross-validations don't work if you use
them as an optimization target. You can try, and might even make a
little headway, but then
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 06:28:05PM +0530, Shipra Bijpuria wrote:
> I would first look at the dataset stats and define a resolution range
> mainly based on I/sigI >1 and cc1/2 >0.5. Based on this, would take the
> good resolution datasets only.
Some probably obvious word of caution here: these
