To whom it may concern,
I am currently working with CCP4 version 8.0.016 on an Ubuntu 22.04 system. In
my efforts to follow the guidelines provided in the documentation
(https://ccp4i2.gitlab.io/rstdocs/i2run/i2run.html), I have encountered an
issue. Specifically, I have encountered a problem w
Dear CCP4ers,
The ESRF User Meeting for 2024 is scheduled to be held onsite from 5th
to 7th February.
https://www.esrf.fr/home/events/conferences/2024/user-meeting-2024.html
This edition includes three Tutorials related to Structural Biology:
- Monday 5th, 9:00 - 12:30 (hybrid event): The
The clash score is also impressively high. Your map may have the incorrect
hand. Have you tried flipping it?
Best wishes
Reza
From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Martyn Winn -
STFC UKRI <7c0f4d7fc2b7-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk>
Sent: 10 January 2024 4:5
THere must be some error in the calculation of the CC - or you are over
optimistic about what constitutes a fit!
What does the COOT density fit show?
Eleanor
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 09:54, Martyn Winn - STFC UKRI <
7c0f4d7fc2b7-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk> wrote:
> You can also try the CCPEM
Dear all,
wwPDB anticipates that all the four character PDB accession codes (PDB
ID) will be consumed by 2029.
With the continuous growth of PDB archive, wwPDB has revised the PDB
accession code format by extending its length and prepending “PDB”
(e.g., "1abc" will become "pdb_1abc"). Th
You can also try the CCPEM list for more cryoEM-orientated advice
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCPEM and look in CCP-EM for more fitting,
refinement, validation tools.
Certainly, the map doesn’t look 3A, unless you have filtered it for these
pictures. The CC for the middle and C-terminal domains
You can also try the CCPEM list for more cryoEM-orientated advice
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCPEM and look in CCP-EM for more fitting,
refinement, validation tools.
Certainly, the map doesn’t look 3A, unless you have filtered it for these
pictures. The CC for the middle and C-terminal domains
Are you confident that your 3 Å resolution is correct? The map in the picture you supplied looks more like 5 Å, and the model vs. map FSC at 0.5 is apparently 20 Å (?).BasilGesendet mit der mobilen Mail AppAm 10.01.24 um 05:57 schrieb Ketul Saharan
