Based on the simulations I've done the data should be cut at CC1/2 = 0.
Seriously. Problem is figuring out where it hits zero.
Alternately, if French Wilson can be modified so the Wilson plot is always
straight, then the data don't need to be cut at all.
As for the resolution of the
Actually, Jeff, the problem goes even deeper than that. Have a look at these
Wilson plots:
http://bl831.als.lbl.gov/~jamesh/wilson/wilsons.png
For these plots I took Fs from a unit cell full of a random collection of
atoms, squared them, added Gaussian noise with RMS = 1, and then ran them back
You mean something like the animation at the top of this web page?
http://bl831.als.lbl.gov/~jamesh/fastBragg/
This program is a relative of nearBragg, which Dale already mentioned.
-James Holton
MAD Scientist
On Jan 6, 2012, at 5:44 PM, Jacob Keller j-kell...@fsm.northwestern.edu wrote:
The CCP4 program that makes the label map you are looking for is SFALL. It
can be told to make a .map file where each grid point is still a floating-point
number, but instead of the usual electron density it encodes the residue
number, atom number, etc. The OVERLAPMAP program knows how to
