[ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] Dependency of theta on n/d in Bragg's law

2013-08-23 Thread Herman . Schreuder
Dear Edward, Now I am getting a little confused: If you look at a "higher order" 2n reflection, you will also get diffraction from the intermediate "1n" layers, so the structure factor you are looking at is in fact the "1n" structure factor. I think your original post was correct. To summarize

Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] Dependency of theta on n/d in Bragg's law

2013-08-23 Thread Edward A. Berry
I think we are just discussing different ways of saying the same thing now. But that can be interesting, too. If not, read no farther. herman.schreu...@sanofi.com wrote: Dear Edward, Now I am getting a little confused: If you look at a "higher order" 2n reflection, you will also get diffracti

Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] Dependency of theta on n/d in Bragg's law

2013-08-23 Thread Jrh
Dear Edward, Re your em colleagues:- We are indeed happy to understand their diffraction to 5th order, by which we mean the d/5 reflection (1st order) because the two are simply different viewpoints. Just one loose end:- The remarkable thing is that the diffraction from a crystal is largely empt