Re: [ccp4bb] BLT wish

2011-08-18 Thread Harry
Hi Bill Sorry, I was tired! Yes, I agree entirely. Trying to maintain one's own working TclTk from source is not straightforward, and best avoided. CCP4 know this and are working hard to remedy the situation! On 17 Aug 2011, at 23:31, William Scott wrote: On Aug 17, 2011, at 3:25 PM,

Re: [ccp4bb] BLT wish

2011-08-17 Thread Tim Gruene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Phil, 'wish' works on Debian (stable upwards) (and therefore probably also on Ubuntu) where blt is hidden in a library, and it works greatly - I used to do the opposite, i.e. changing bltwish into wish but e.g. loggraph did not work properly that

Re: [ccp4bb] BLT wish

2011-08-17 Thread Phil Evans
It doesn't seem to work out of the box on Centos5.6, nor on Scientific Linux 6. On SL6 I think we had to install yet another TCLTK from somewhere (can't remember) to get BLT, and with that one using wish does work Roll on the loggraph replacement! Phil On 17 Aug 2011, at 10:38, Tim Gruene

Re: [ccp4bb] BLT wish

2011-08-17 Thread Stuart McNicholas
On 17/08/11 10:49, Phil Evans wrote: Roll on the loggraph replacement! Next month ?

Re: [ccp4bb] BLT wish

2011-08-17 Thread Andreas Förster
Dear Phil, for me (RHEL 6.1, 64-bit, ccp4 6.2), loggraph works with wish but requires bltwish. The command is exec $CCP4I_TCLTK/wish $0 -- ${1+$@} but if I set export CCP4I_TCLTK=/sharedSoftware/ActiveTcl-8.5/bin I get the same error that you report because ActiveTcl-8.5 doesn't contain

Re: [ccp4bb] BLT wish

2011-08-17 Thread William Scott
Yeah, it was a totally delightful interaction. So much for the Ubuntu spread the love of humanity theme. They have successfully migrated from figure 3 to figure 2: http://bandcamp.tv/linux-demotivators/ As for BLT, my sense (being the unfortunate maintainer for it on fink) is that it is dead

Re: [ccp4bb] BLT wish

2011-08-17 Thread William Scott
On Aug 17, 2011, at 3:25 PM, Harry wrote: Hi Bill I don't think this includes BLT, does it? No. That was what I was trying to say (apparently not very well, sorry!): On 17 Aug 2011, at 22:33, William Scott wrote: if CCP4 could free itself of this dependency... …then it could make