Not to toot our own horn too much, but CHESS has been ahead of the curve on
this for at least 30 years. As an academic facility, we simply take our
limitless supply of graduate students, wipe their memory, upload what we need,
and lock them in dimly-lit facilities. No freezing in liquid nitrogen
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of
Peter Keller
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2019 12:04
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Backup of whole synchrotrons
Hi Robbie,
On 01/04/2019 07:23, Robbie Joosten wrote:
I don't think making this GDOR complient is that
y.
Cheers,
Robbie
> -Original Message-
> From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of
> Peter Keller
> Sent: Monday, April 01, 2019 12:04
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Backup of whole synchrotrons
>
> Hi Robbie,
>
>
Hi Robbie,
On 01/04/2019 07:23, Robbie Joosten wrote:
I don't think making this GDOR complient is that hard. It's all pretty
well defined what you store (everything), where you store it, and why.
There are some philosophical problems with allowing users to have their
data deleted. Assuming the
I don't think making this GDOR complient is that hard. It's all pretty well
defined what you store (everything), where you store it, and why.
There are some philosophical problems with allowing users to have their data
deleted. Assuming the copy is good enough to reproducing the experiment.
Dele
While this may sound absurd, the principle of incremental backups can help out
a great deal here. Like Apple’s Time Machine, all we need to do is store a copy
of the things which have changed rather than the entire facility, which reduces
the burden by at least a few orders of magnitude. Such ef
Dear colleagues,
We all are very happy about the storage of raw crystallographic datasets. But,
is it really enough? No! Can we do better? Yes, of course!
The problem is that the crystal after the measurement is usually burned. It
does not make sense to store them any more. But, in order to maxim
