kludges probably won't do.
BR
-Original Message-
From: Tim Gruene [mailto:t...@shelx.uni-ac.gwdg.de]
Sent: Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2014 12:10
To: b...@hofkristallamt.org; CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] correlated alternate confs -
validation?
-
st, BR
>
>
>
>
>
> From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf
> Of dusan turk Sent: Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2014 05:32 To:
> CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: [ccp4bb] Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb]
> correlated alternate confs - validation?
>
>
>
alf Of dusan
turk
Sent: Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2014 05:32
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] correlated alternate confs -
validation?
Hello,
A solution exists also for PDB records:
As a consequence of a discussion with George which took place years ago, I
have
Hello,
A solution exists also for PDB records:
As a consequence of a discussion with George which took place years ago, I
have taken the liberty to extend the PDB record length of 80 characters and
use additional characters to specify the group ID and their members list number
and provided