Hi,
This is why the right way to distribute *nix software is to distribute
> software itself and ask the end-user to get all the dependencies (not
> that hard these days).
it is a wonderful idea, apart from two tiny nuances: 1) many have no idea
about what the command line is, and 2) asking us
__
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Ed Pozharski
[epozh...@umaryland.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 9:24 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] COOT not "connected" to PHENIX
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 10:33 +0200, Tim Gruene wrote:
> with every
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 10:33 +0200, Tim Gruene wrote:
> with every python script one has to distribute a specific python
> version
... and with every program one has to distribute binaries for every
platform... more food for my prejudice against software ;-)
This really is not about python, it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Grand - with every python script one has to distribute a specific python
version. More food for my prejudice against python ;-)
Tim
On 10/26/2011 12:15 AM, Paul Emsley wrote:
> FYI, from version 0.7, I will not distribute binaries without python.
>
>
FYI, from version 0.7, I will not distribute binaries without python.
Paul.
On 25/10/11 17:02, Yuri wrote:
I installed the version with python embedded in coot
And it works!!
Thanks a lot!!
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:41:38 -0700, Nathaniel Echols wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Yuri wro
I installed the version with python embedded in coot
And it works!!
Thanks a lot!!
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:41:38 -0700, Nathaniel Echols wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Yuri wrote:
Now here comes the stupid question...
How do I fix it?
Install a different coot version or is it somethin
