---------------------------------
*From:*CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Keller, Jacob
[kell...@janelia.hhmi.org]
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 30, 2016 5:44 PM
*To:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK <mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
*Subject:* Re: [ccp4bb] Effects of Multiplicity and Fine Phi with Equ
nceton.edu>>
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 7:36 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Effects of Multiplicity and Fine Phi with Equivalent
Count Numbers
Jacob,
If you fine slice and everything is then a partial, isn't that *more* sen
99 paper.
JPK
Phil Jeffrey
Princeton
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Keller, Jacob
[kell...@janelia.hhmi.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 5:44 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Effects of Multiplic
..@janelia.hhmi.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 5:44 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Effects of Multiplicity and Fine Phi with Equivalent
Count Numbers
If the mosaicity is, say, 0.5 deg, and one is measuring 1 deg frames, about
half the time is spent measuring non-spot backgr
org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 5:44 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Effects of Multiplicity and Fine Phi with Equivalent
Count Numbers
If the mosaicity is, say, 0.5 deg, and one is measuring 1 deg frames, about
half the time is spent measuring non-spot background nois
ubject: [ccp4bb] Effects of Multiplicity and Fine Phi with Equivalent Count
Numbers
Dear Crystallographers,
I am curious whether the observed effects of fine phi slicing might in part or
in toto be due to simply higher "pseudo-multiplicity." In other words, under
normal experimental c
8-646-1710
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Keller, Jacob [kell...@janelia.hhmi.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 11:37 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Effects of Multiplicity and Fine Phi with Equivalent Count Numbers
Dear Crystallographers,
I am curious whether the observed effects of fine phi slicing might in part or
in toto be due to simply higher "pseudo-multiplicity." In other words, under
normal experimental conditions, does simply increasing the number of
measurements increase the signal and improve p
