Re: [ccp4bb] FW: Refmac 5.5 vs 5.2; repost with data

2008-12-18 Thread Stephen Cusack
Dear Sean, I have noticed this and more to the point the geometry as assessed by MOLPROBITY is much worse for the latest version of REFMAC (3.0068). I have tested a few other versions of REFMAC and the results vary quite a lot. For exactly the same run, I get the best results with an o

[ccp4bb] FW: Refmac 5.5 vs 5.2; repost with data

2008-12-18 Thread Sean Devenish
Hi all, I have just installed the new CCP4I package for Windows, and refined a structure I was working on using an older version (CCP4I 6.0.2), and the refinement statistics are significantly worse when using the same input files. Under Refmac 5.2 the details were: $$ Ncyc Rfact Rfr