Dear BB,
Thanks for all of your helpful and useful comments
Whilst there was some agreement that simulated annealing should be enough to
solve any problems, we have taken perhaps the cautious approach.
We have produced a freeR set in the bigger unit cell using reindex as suggested
by Eleanor:
m referees (...)?
Good luck,
Boaz
- Original Message -
From: Kay Diederichs
Date: Saturday, October 30, 2010 14:23
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Free R with doubled cell edge
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Hi Ed,
in the new cell (long a axis), the reflections H K L are related
by
H=2*h
n
> Would there be any objection from referees (...)?
>
> Good luck,
>
>Boaz
> - Original Message -
> From: Kay Diederichs
> Date: Saturday, October 30, 2010 14:23
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Free R with doubled cell edge
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
corner by suggesting this route? Would there be any
objection from referees (...)?
Good luck,
Boaz
- Original Message -
From: Kay Diederichs
Date: Saturday, October 30, 2010 14:23
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Free R with doubled cell edge
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Hi Ed,
&g
Hi Ed,
in the new cell (long a axis), the reflections H K L are related by
H=2*h K=k L=l to those of the old (short a) cell. I would expect that
the R-factor of those H K L reflections with even H from the new crystal
form is low (at least at low resolution) against the h k l reflections
of t
Dear BB Sages,
I have a problem where I think I could very easily do the wrong thing.
And I don't really want to do that...
We have solved a new structure using zinc SAD phases (1 zinc in 27kD, 2 Zn/AU -
Shelx, RESOLVE, ARPwARP. Cool.).
In p21 30 109 65 90 105 90 at 2.5A
However, we have now co
