I presume theta1 theta2theta3 are eulerian angles?
When theta2 ~ 0, you can onlyy define theta1+theta2 so solution 1 is
effectively the identity;
theta1+theta3 = 360 (ie 0) theta2~0. theta3 not defined - that
generates the identity matrix.
When theta2 ~ 180, you can onlyy define theta1-t
...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On Behalf Of James
Stroud
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 3:57 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Obtaining relationships between two cross rotation
solutions?
I forgot to mention that I think the only fail-safe direct approach
will involve converting both rotations into
I forgot to mention that I think the only fail-safe direct approach
will involve converting both rotations into quaternions,
"subtracting" (inv(A)*B) said quaternions, then converting the
difference into an axis-angle pair.
James
On Feb 3, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Francis E Reyes wrote:
I have
Transform a molecule according to the two transformations in which you
are interested and then use dyndom to see the hinge axis that relates
the two transformed molecules.
On Feb 3, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Francis E Reyes wrote:
I have trouble with visualizing things in three dimensions so I'm
I have trouble with visualizing things in three dimensions so I'm
trying to figure out the relationship between two cross rotation
functions (given as theta1, theta2, theta3).
Is there a program or webapp that'll tell me whether two rotation
solutions are related by a 180/90/60/whathaveyo
