You need to try both P61 22 and P6522 with the Se sites changed fron
x,y,z to -x,-y,-z. The anom differences can be explained by either
solution. But maybe these programs automatically check both hands?
Eleanor Dodson
Ethayathulla Abdulsamath wrote:
hi BertThank you for your reply. Your are
hi BertThank you for your reply. Your are right about the values for your
Pattersons and NatFourier, but the systematic absences and pointless suggested
me to be P6122 and according to mathews coeff i get nbsp; 1 molecule with
Vm=nbsp; 2.06 solvent=nbsp; 40.42. My protein has two SeMet sites so
hello peteri tried phenix.autosol. It gave me following results.nbsp; but the
data
analyses says that my data pseudo translational symmetry, I have pasted it. Do
phenix handle pseudotranslation. Need suggestion on thisSolution # 1nbsp;
BAYES-CC: 15.3 +/- 27.3 Dataset #1nbsp;nbsp; SG: P 61 2
