2012 at 11:27 AM
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac: ADP is non-positive
> To: wtempel
> Cc: CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk
>
>
> On Tuesday, 24 July 2012, wtempel wrote:
> > CCP4ers,
> >
> > a log file from Refmac_5.7.0027 presents me with this line:
> >
> >
>
38, 33A**2, respectively. Could refmac just be taking exception to the
missing N atom?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ethan Merritt
Date: Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac: ADP is non-positive
To: wtempel
Cc: CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk
On Tuesday, 24 July 2012, wte
On Tuesday, 24 July 2012, wtempel wrote:
> CCP4ers,
>
> a log file from Refmac_5.7.0027 presents me with this line:
>
>
> Problem with the ADP of the atom N A 3 ADP is non-positive
> -1.7740907E+35
>
>
> I did not explicitely refine ADPs or TLS.
> Should I modify my model when I
CCP4ers,
a log file from Refmac_5.7.0027 presents me with this line:
Problem with the ADP of the atom N A 3 ADP is non-positive
-1.7740907E+35
I did not explicitely refine ADPs or TLS.
Should I modify my model when I encounter such a message? If yes, does the
message refer to a
