Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac5 refinement question

2019-03-12 Thread Robbie Joosten
Hi Ray, Not necessarily close to 1.00 but rather 1.00 or lower. Cheers, Robbie -Original Message- From: Raymond Brown [mailto:ray-br...@att.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 15:56 To: Robbie Joosten Cc: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac5 refinement question Hi Robbie

Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac5 refinement question

2019-03-12 Thread Raymond Brown
Joosten wrote: Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac5 refinement question To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Date: Tuesday, March 12, 2019, 4:58 AM Hi Ray, This is how I see it: Because different bond length and angle target tolerances/sigmas you cannot compare them on an absolute scale. What is less

Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac5 refinement question

2019-03-12 Thread Robbie Joosten
ric restraint weights. HTH, Robbie -Original Message- From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Raymond Brown Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 17:11 To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: [ccp4bb] Refmac5 refinement question Hi folks, What are acceptable values for

[ccp4bb] Refmac5 refinement question

2019-03-11 Thread Raymond Brown
Hi folks, What are acceptable values for RMS Bond length, RMS Bond angle and RMS Chiral volume? The tutorial suggests RMS Bond length of 0.0200? I would like to hear your suggestions and/or rationale. Many thanks Ray Brown