Dear Katherine,
I would like to add a futher point to this discussion: If you do model residues
with poor or no electron density, then you should be sure of what you are doing
and not just make more or less unguided guesses. This seems obvious but
unfortunately it isn't, at least not to
On Apr 15, 2010, at 10:08, Thomas Lütteke wrote:
Dear Katherine,
I would like to add a futher point to this discussion: If you do
model residues with poor or no electron density, then you should be
sure of what you are doing and not just make more or less unguided
guesses. This seems
In this lab there are as many takes on this as there are
crystallographers I think! It seems to depend on personality - are you a
wild optimist who traces connectivity at 0.5 Sigma - or a cautious soul
who hates to be wrong..
It seems to me that there are often disordered regions we can never
Eleanor Dodson wrote:
In this lab there are as many takes on this as there are
crystallographers I think! It seems to depend on personality - are you a
wild optimist who traces connectivity at 0.5 Sigma - or a cautious soul
who hates to be wrong..
Blimey, I think it's the other way round.
Katherine,
all good questions and all discussed previously on this very discussion
board. My personal opinion did not change much since 2007:
http://www.dl.ac.uk/list-archive-public/ccp4bb/msg19777.html
although I would probably amend couple of minor things. As for riding
hydrogens, take a
Dear Crystallographic Community,
Dr. Holton made a comment today that got me thinking on the issue
of modeling. This has been a hotly debated topic in our own lab
but I would like to hear the current opinions of the community as
a whole. It is a question of two parts.
First, what do you
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 5:40 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] To model or not to model...
Dear Crystallographic Community,
Dr. Holton made a comment today that got me thinking on the issue
of modeling. This has been a hotly debated topic in our own lab
but I would like
: [ccp4bb] To model or not to model...
Dear Crystallographic Community,
Dr. Holton made a comment today that got me thinking on the issue
of modeling. This has been a hotly debated topic in our own lab
but I would like to hear the current opinions of the community as
a whole. It is a question
] On Behalf Of Jürgen
Bosch
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 6:41 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] To model or not to model...
I should add a comment here about density that might or might not be there
:-)
Graphent - trying is believing
Jürgen
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg
Le 17 nov. 09 à 12:40, Morten Kjeldgaard a écrit :
Tim Gruene wrote:
Yes, but models that can be validated against experimental data.
The
defining characteristics of computational models is that they (A)
are 100% dependent on the algortihm, (B) can't be validated at
all.
Cheers,
Morten
10 matches
Mail list logo
