Dear all,
I forgot to mention the resolution for our structure. It's 3.2 A.
-Sagar
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Sagar De'Biomimic <
sagarbiophys...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> We have solved a structure of Protein-DNA complex. In an ASU we have two
> protein homodimers and two DNA dup
Hi All,
perhaps rank scaling of maps as described here
Acta Cryst. (2014). D70, 2593-2606
instead of "sigma" scaling is a way to eliminate the ambiguity inherent to
"sigma" scaling.
Pavel
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Gerard Bricogne
wrote:
> Dear Sagar and Pavel,
>
> Yes, it may be
ut-off of 1.0
>
>
> Thierry
>
> -Original Message-
> From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Gerard
> Bricogne
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 8:32 AM
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Validity of Modeling of
UK] On Behalf Of Gerard
Bricogne
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 8:32 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Validity of Modeling of Highly flexible region at low
sigma levels
Dear Sagar and Pavel,
Yes, it may be model bias, but you also have to bear in mind that
the rmsd that
Dear Sagar and Pavel,
Yes, it may be model bias, but you also have to bear in mind that
the rmsd that is used as a unit in the choice of contouring level
should not be thought of as the standard deviation of a Gaussian
random variable and therefore implicitly associated to a "significance
lev
Sagar,
what you see may be model bias unless you calculated these maps without
that region of molecule.
Pavel
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Sagar De'Biomimic <
sagarbiophys...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> We have solved a structure of Protein-DNA complex. In an ASU we have two
> protei
