I am working on a small project which requires me to obtain the proper
orientation of a crystal lattice with respect to the gonistat and source. I
have until now successfully used the matrices from Mosflm and DENZO, which
are consistent with each other and define the orientation of the reciprocal
l
(I think) these matrices are roughly 180 degrees apart, so they may just
correspond to different signs of the axes
Phil
On 28 Dec 2014, at 21:37, Igor Petrik wrote:
> I am working on a small project which requires me to obtain the proper
> orientation of a crystal lattice with respect to the g
Hi,
xdsme has xds2mos.py script.
https://code.google.com/p/xdsme/
https://code.google.com/p/xdsme/source/browse/XOconv/xds2mos.py
Best regards,
Takanori Nakane
On 2014/12/29 6:37, Igor Petrik wrote:
I am working on a small project which requires me to obtain the proper
orientation of a cryst
Takanori and Pierre,
Thank you for your quick responses. If you read my post you will see that I
used the xds2mos.py script to convert the xds orientation to Mosflm format,
but this gives me a result that is inconsistent with the matrix calculated
directly by moslfm or DENZO. For orthorombic space
On Sun, 28 Dec 2014 15:37:22 -0600, Igor Petrik wrote:
...
> DIRECT BEAM COORDINATES (REC. ANGSTROEM) 0.003134 0.005401 1.020962
> DETECTOR COORDINATES (PIXELS) OF DIRECT BEAM1230.87 1260.93
> DETECTOR ORIGIN (PIXELS) AT 1226.25 1252.96
> CRYSTAL TO DETECTOR DISTAN
Yes, unfortunately an "orientation matrix" is completely useless without
a frame of reference. All it does is tell you where the cell axes lie
relative to "X", "Y" and "Z", but "X" may be the x-ray beam, or
sometimes that is "Z" and "X" is the spindle axis. Different people have
different and
