Oops.
My link & terminology were a little wayward...
I knew what I meant, but the incorrect link may have proven misleading.
But the answer essentially remains the same:
1) Integrate everything in MOSFLM
2) Enforce consistent indexing using POINTLESS (unless I am mistaken, there
are alternat
Surely the original poster meant "alternate indexing possibilites" (as
discussed in http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/dist/html/reindexing.html; for his
space group there are indeed 2 ways to index), not "alternate origins".
Kay
Meyer, Peter schrieb:
Doubtlessly I'm confused, but my understanding was tha
Doubtlessly I'm confused, but my understanding was that alternative origins
would only be an issue once a dataset was phased (so that wouldn't cause
problem during integrating/scaling). I'd thought that using a consistent unit
cell during indexing and scaling was a separate issue.
Any chance y
Hello Yadong,
This is what I would do in your position.
1) Integrate everything in MOSFLM
2) Enforce consistent indexing using POINTLESS (unless I am mistaken, there
are alternative origin(s) in p321)
http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/dist/html/alternate_origins.html
ftp://ftp.ccp4.ac.uk/ccp4/6.0.2/prereleas
Hi there,
I have 3 incomplete data sets, collected from 3 single crystals, each accounts
for ~40% completeness. They have same resolution range, and randomly overlap
with each other a small portion.
Mosflm and Scala work well for all 3 separately. The 2 from same beamline have
very close stati
