I thought... we had a definition for reportable resolution: The resolution at
which I/sig(I) = 2, and completeness 50%
This reported resolution is not to be confused with data cutoff. We give the
software all the scaled and merged data and let it down-weight the weak data.
At the edge, we
There are three places in a pdb file where resolution is defined.
Unfortunately by current conventions I believe they are all required
to show the same value. If one of them could be redefined to be
effective resolution, with a comment to explain how that was
arrived at, it would take the
