-Original Message-
From: Boaz Shaanan bshaa...@exchange.bgu.ac.il
To: CCP4BB CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Sent: Tue, Apr 30, 2013 2:53 pm
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] detectors on home sources
One of the main things (if not THE main thing) to worry about when
investing in such expensive equipment
I can not really speak for a home-source setup, but here at the SLS MX
group we run two Pilatus6M (one of which is the first Pilatus ever made)
and one Pilatus2M. In nearly four years since we installed the first one
we never had any hardware issue other than users damaging the case. So
I'd say
@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Sent: Tue, Apr 30, 2013 2:53 pm
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] detectors on home sources
One of the main things (if not THE main thing) to worry about when
investing in such expensive equipment is long-time reliability and quality
of service in your place. Nothing is more frustrating than
I'm involved in advising my institute on an X-ray home source for a core
facility. The vendors are offering some new configurations. Whatever the
claimed advantages/disadvantages, I'm hesitant to make a decision without
consulting someone with direct experience with them. In particular, has
The Excillum MetalJet (TM) source is technically very interesting, with
its liquid metal jet anode, but I have no idea how well it works for
typical in-house crystallography use.
On 04/30/13 15:00, Fareed Aboul-Ela wrote:
I'm involved in advising my institute on an X-ray home source for a
30, 2013 10:00 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] detectors on home sources
I'm involved in advising my institute on an X-ray home source for a core facility. The vendors are offering some new configurations. Whatever the claimed advantages/disadvantages, I'm hesitant to make
