Hi
It's possible (though Garib has told me you shouldn't do it...) to integrate
using anisotropic limits with Mosflm - it's pretty straightforward. Some users
have told me it really helped.
On 12 Nov 2014, at 21:26, Robert Keenan wrote:
>
>
> I have three datasets of varying quality collecte
Dear Robert,
the data sets don't seem too anisotropic, and the week reflections in
poorly reflecting direction of dataset 1 that you include by setting the
resolution range to 3.5A may not deteriorate the overall scaling that much.
They may actually be kicked out as outliers and not used for scal
BLEND is mainly applicable to cases with many more than 3 data sets. So I would
say it does notadd anything useful to what already suggested by Matthias.
I have had positive results when scaling and merging several (unmerged)
anisotropic data togetherwith POINTLESS / AIMLESS. The main reason fo
Would the CCP4 program BLEND be a suitable initial option? And then the
anisotropic server?
Tony.
--- sent from my mobile account ---
On 12 Nov 2014, at 21:29, Robert Keenan
mailto:bkee...@uchicago.edu>> wrote:
I have three datasets of varying quality collected from different regions of a
Hi Bob,
we have done elliptic truncation before merging/scaling as lined out in
2012 Zebisch (JMB).
However, I see no reason not to scale the 3 runs together with aimless
(to lets say 3.4A) and then subject the resulting merged file
to the sawata server.
Best,
Matthias
-
I have three datasets of varying quality collected from different regions of a
single crystal. In each case, the data are anisotropic (from Aimless using
CC1/2>0.5):
Dataset 1: 3.5, 3.5 5.5 A
Dataset 2: 4.2, 4.3, 4.8 A
Dataset 3: 3.7, 3.9, 4.4 A
I initially took a simple-minded approach an
