On 7/23/13 9:01 AM, Edward A. Berry wrote:
Here we need some clarification on which I/s(I) is meant - sigma(I)
for the
individual measurements, or sigma(I) from error propagation to the final
I which as Engin notes will be lower.
Isn't the reported Mean(I/sigI) in the reported Aimless table
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:11:04AM -0500, Engin Ozkan wrote:
Isn't the reported Mean(I/sigI) in the reported Aimless table for
the merged/averaged reflections (because that is what we are
discussing about)?
Yes - according to
1.
Engin Özkan wrote:
Also, why would we be using the batch-wise I/sigma's for determining
resolution cutoffs?
Agreed. For cutoff I guess it should be the final sigma going into the refinement program that matters, irrespective of
whether that was achieve by averaging more images or using a
On Monday, 22 July 2013, Katherine Donovan wrote:
Hi All,
I have a data set that was collected to about 2.2A, which I have processed in
either P21 (to 2.4 A) or C2221 (2.25A).
So I'm confused.
You may not know what the spacegroup is, but you are processing
the same spots either way. Why
On 7/22/13 11:20 PM, Ethan Merritt wrote:
Which brings up the point that something seems to have
gone wrong in one of your processing runs.
Both runs claim mean (I/sigI) in the outer shell is 2.0,
but in one case this is for the 2.4A shell and in the other case
it's for the 2.2A shell. That is
