[ccp4bb] shelxl LS refinement problem: summary

2009-05-28 Thread Matthew BOWLER
Dear BB, after very quick replies from George Sheldrick and Kay Diederichs we recompiled shelxh setting JW to 1200 and IM to 32000 and it worked beautifully. Thank you both very much for your help, regards, Matt. -- Matthew Bowler Structural Biology Group European Synchrotron Radiatio

Re: [ccp4bb] shelxl LS refinement problem

2009-05-28 Thread Ian Tickle
wner-ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On > Behalf Of George M. Sheldrick > Sent: 28 May 2009 11:59 > To: Matthew BOWLER > Cc: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK > Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] shelxl LS refinement problem > > Dear Matt, > > It is nice to see a message about SHELX on the BB, compared

Re: [ccp4bb] shelxl LS refinement problem

2009-05-28 Thread George M. Sheldrick
Dear Matt, It is nice to see a message about SHELX on the BB, compared with the frequency of messages about certain other programs I have the impression that no-one is using SHELX these days! You should be using the larger version SHELXH, available from the SHELX server. If that is still too sma

Re: [ccp4bb] shelxl LS refinement problem

2009-05-28 Thread Kay Diederichs
Matthew BOWLER schrieb: Dear BB, I have refined a 1.05A structure with shelxl and would now like to get some values on the coordinate error by doing a least squares full matrix cycle, unrestrained. I have followed all the procedures that I can find, but I keep getting the error message **

[ccp4bb] shelxl LS refinement problem

2009-05-28 Thread Matthew BOWLER
Dear BB, I have refined a 1.05A structure with shelxl and would now like to get some values on the coordinate error by doing a least squares full matrix cycle, unrestrained. I have followed all the procedures that I can find, but I keep getting the error message ** ARRAY B TOO SMALL FOR TH