Re: [ccp4bb] thanks god for pdbset

2012-12-05 Thread Robbie Joosten
Hi Peter, Thanks for the info. I'd better go check whether my code assumes insertion codes are not digits. Cheers, Robbie > Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 17:57:58 + > From: pkel...@globalphasing.com > Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] thanks god for pdbset > To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK >

Re: [ccp4bb] thanks god for pdbset

2012-12-05 Thread Robbie Joosten
lem at all. In practice, as Ed pointed out, it is a big mess. Cheers, Robbie > -Original Message- > From: Ian Tickle [mailto:ianj...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 17:26 > To: Robbie Joosten > Cc: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK > Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] thanks god

Re: [ccp4bb] thanks god for pdbset

2012-12-05 Thread Ed Pozharski
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 17:02 +0100, Robbie Joosten wrote: > Does 128A come before or after 128? Robbie, shouldn't it simply depend on which residue record comes first in the pdb file? Ed. -- Oh, suddenly throwing a giraffe into a volcano to make water is crazy?

Re: [ccp4bb] thanks god for pdbset

2012-12-05 Thread Peter Keller
Hi Robbie, On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 17:02 +0100, Robbie Joosten wrote: > Hi Ian, > > It's easy to forget about LINK records and such when dealing with the > coordinates (I recently had to fix a bug in my own code for that). > The problem with insertion codes is that they are very poorly defined in

Re: [ccp4bb] thanks god for pdbset

2012-12-05 Thread Ian Tickle
Perhaps switching to mmCIF gets rid of the problem. > > Cheers, > Robbie > > > -Original Message- > > From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of > > Ian Tickle > > Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 16:39 > > To: CCP4BB@JISCMAI

Re: [ccp4bb] thanks god for pdbset

2012-12-05 Thread Robbie Joosten
obbie > -Original Message- > From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of > Ian Tickle > Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 16:39 > To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK > Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] thanks god for pdbset > > The last time I tried the pdbse

Re: [ccp4bb] thanks god for pdbset

2012-12-05 Thread Ian Tickle
The last time I tried the pdbset renumber command because of issues with insertion codes in certain programs, it failed to also renumber the LINK, SSBOND & CISPEP records. Needless to say, thanking god (or even God) was not my first thought! (more along the lines of "why can't software developers

Re: [ccp4bb] thanks god for pdbset

2012-12-05 Thread Phil Evans
not god & I don't think I wrote that bit! Phil On 5 Dec 2012, at 15:06, Ed Pozharski wrote: > Francois, > > I did not realize Phil Evans is god (perhaps a minor one as he did not > yet earn a capital G). > > I do concur that insertion code is evil. I had to re-refine an old > antibody structu

Re: [ccp4bb] thanks god for pdbset

2012-12-05 Thread Ed Pozharski
Francois, I did not realize Phil Evans is god (perhaps a minor one as he did not yet earn a capital G). I do concur that insertion code is evil. I had to re-refine an old antibody structure recently and it messes up coot sequence window and breaks refmac bond restraints. Evil, evil,.evil. Chee

[ccp4bb] thanks god for pdbset

2012-12-04 Thread Francois Berenger
Especially the renumber command that changes residue insertion codes into an increment of the impacted residue numbers. Regards, F.