Look at CCP4 v7.0 Program Documentation
reindexing
Yes PG 321 has two indexing options..
- *i.e.* reindex (h,k,l) to (k,h,-l) which is equivalent here to
reindexing (h,k,l) to (-h,-k,l).
On 29 March 2018 at 21:26, Gihan Ketawala wrote:
> Hi,
> Can the point group 321 show indexing am
Yes, several, but it's only important when merging multiple data sets. And it's
not really ambiguities but alternatives.
JPK
+
Jacob Pearson Keller
Research Scientist / Looger Lab
HHMI Janelia Research Campus
19700 Helix Dr, Ashburn, VA 20147
Desk:
Dear Mohamed
You can get the equivalent of frame.CBF by using the duals image viewer
with datablock or experiments.json and integrated.pickle. this will allow
you to step through the frames looking at the actual integration boxes.
Best wishes Graeme
On 21 May 2015 17:02, "Mohamed Noor" wrote:
>
Even I have the same problem my crystals get processed in to P212121 as
well as P4212 and I am currently analysing the data but not able to
conclude the space group. Any idea? Both structure while refining is giving
around same R/Rfree. Any help will be appreciable.
Dhaval Patel
PhD Student,
Bioin
On 05/21/2015 05:23 PM, Keller, Jacob wrote:
I can process my 3.8 A dataset in either P4 or P422 point groups.
Do the scaling statistics look similar for both? If so, go with P422.
Trying to enforce an incorrect symmetry operator would blow up your stats.
...But in the case of twinning, lower s
>> I can process my 3.8 A dataset in either P4 or P422 point groups.
>Do the scaling statistics look similar for both? If so, go with P422.
>Trying to enforce an incorrect symmetry operator would blow up your stats.
...But in the case of twinning, lower space groups can masquerade as higher
ones
On 05/21/15 11:56, Mohamed Noor wrote:
Dear all
I can process my 3.8 A dataset in either P4 or P422 point groups.
Do the scaling statistics look similar for both? If so, go with P422.
Trying to enforce an incorrect symmetry operator would blow up your stats.
MR searches and refinement in S
