On 08/03/2015 09:54 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Dennis Boone d...@msu.edu wrote:
The main limitation seems to be that it's hard to get the (broken)
data from a block that had a read error when using SCSI hardware.
There's probably a way around this if one digs into
[25kg]
Hmm…. 55 pints?
Not over here
-tony
Hi
Out of curiousity, since I now have a DEC PRO380. Was there any third
party manufacturer of CTI expansion boards?
Regards,
Pontus.
Subject pretty much says it all, except that I need the
ceramic package with the metal lid.
Thanks,
Bill S.
On 08/04/2015 06:17 PM, jwsmobile wrote:
I was on the SCSI committee when the tape commands were proposed. The
original that was proposed was to only have a commands which would be on
disk controllers (who were the main players) to perform backups of disk
units and restores. Luckily that
On 2015-Aug-04, at 6:32 PM, Bill Sudbrink wrote:
Subject pretty much says it all, except that I need the
ceramic package with the metal lid.
Not that it's a help, but I have a Wang calculator that uses an array of
MK4008's. Ceramic lidded but the gold-plated pins rotted on one or two of
them
On 08/03/2015 10:48 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
OK, I verified it was indeed made by Pertec. The title
block of the drawings doesn't have anything real obvious,
but there is a bunch of legal boilerplate advising the
restrictions on use of the drawings, and the last words
are prior written
AIT was 8mm using SONY drives and tapes (industrial use for 8mm camcorder
media).
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Guzis
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 10:20 PM
To: jwsm...@jwsss.com ; gene...@classiccmp.org ;
discuss...@classiccmp.org:On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Bill Sudbrink wh.sudbr...@verizon.net wrote:
Subject pretty much says it all, except that I need the
ceramic package with the metal lid.
Like this?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/MK4008P-2-MOSTEK-16-Pin-GOLD-PURPLE-DIP-Vintage-MK4008-/390115835505
On 08/01/2015 05:10 AM, Adrian Graham wrote:
I'm struggling to find anything that weighs exactly 25kg :)
25 things that weigh 1kg, obviously. :-)
Hmm…. 55 pints?
On Aug 4, 2015, at 4:58 PM, Jules Richardson jules.richardso...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 08/01/2015 05:10 AM, Adrian Graham wrote:
I'm struggling to find anything that weighs exactly 25kg :)
25 things that weigh 1kg, obviously. :-)
On 08/01/2015 05:10 AM, Adrian Graham wrote:
I'm struggling to find anything that weighs exactly 25kg :)
6.6[043] gallons of water
a 25Kg bag of dogfood
1470 3.5 floppies
On 08/04/2015 1:48 PM, dwight wrote:
This all assumes it is a TTL and not an ECL or even
and analog chip, such as an opamp.
Dwight
It might be possible to identify it a bit. Using the Diode Test of your
basic multi-meter you can probably figure out if
From: j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
snip
It's a 16-pin DIP, with the following on it (in three separate lines):
1028126, D39315-A, and CS9336P. The first number looks like the numbers
I've seen on a couple of other un-identified chips, made by TRW. (I hope they
aren't something classified
So, I took Tony's advice (about parts) to heart, and have been stocking up on
all sorts of things. (Ironically, I now have a _far_ better supply of parts
that I had access to, back in the day, at LCS at MIT! But that's a rant for
another day.)
As part of that, I've bought up a number of IC
On 08/04/2015 09:54 AM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
BTW, what do you use to read UNIX v7 tar files? Linux/BSD modern tar
seem not to like the old archive format--they use the posix
version.
Scratch that--it helps if what you're working with is actually a .tar file.
Nevermind. It's not even 10:30AM
From: Chuck Guzis
BTW, what do you use to read UNIX v7 tar files? Linux/BSD modern tar
seem not to like the old archive format
I have a very slightly hacked version of the V7 tar, which runs under Windows
(under Cygwin). It read all the older TAR files which the newer TARs barfed
On 08/04/2015 11:40 AM, John Robertson wrote:
You could always get one of those inexpensive TTL device identifiers to
see if the house number crosses over:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/281682288251
My Xeltek programmer has that function--and it works for some common TTL
ICs, but gets a lot less
Hello Adrian,
Any news on whether I might be able to get my hands on the 2000 and 4000
VLC?
Regards
Rob
On 1 August 2015 at 11:59, Adrian Graham wit...@binarydinosaurs.co.uk
wrote:
No probs Rob, I'll give it a couple of days and dig through my old messages
from Dec/Jan this year. The
This all assumes it is a TTL and not an ECL or even
and analog chip, such as an opamp.
Dwight
On 2015-08-04 6:32 PM, Fred Cisin wrote:
On 08/01/2015 05:10 AM, Adrian Graham wrote:
I'm struggling to find anything that weighs exactly 25kg :)
6.6[043] gallons of water
a 25Kg bag of dogfood
1470 3.5 floppies
About a kajillion emails
On 8/3/2015 9:54 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Dennis Boone d...@msu.edu wrote:
The main limitation seems to be that it's hard to get the (broken) data
from a block that had a read error when using SCSI hardware. There's
probably a way around this if one digs into
22 matches
Mail list logo
