> On Feb 6, 2017, at 10:13 PM, william degnan wrote:
>
> CORRECTION:
>
> Running simH on a $9.95 Next Thing Co CHIP.
>
> 1. I built an RL01 disk with RSX11/M that boots within simH using the
> files I found online.
>
> set cpu 11/40
> set cpu 64K
> set rl0 writeenabled
> set rl0 rl01
> set r
One last comment...I will edit and clean up the directions for anyone
interested
http://vintagecomputer.net/browse_thread.cfm?id=668
One last comment...I will edit and clean up the directions for anyone who
wants them in the future here:
http://vintagecomputer.net/browse_thread.cfm?id=668
thanks again all.
Bill
CORRECTION:
Running simH on a $9.95 Next Thing Co CHIP.
1. I built an RL01 disk with RSX11/M that boots within simH using the
files I found online.
set cpu 11/40
set cpu 64K
set rl0 writeenabled
set rl0 rl01
set rl1 writeenabled
set rl1 rl01
set rl2 writeenabled
set rl2 rl01
set rl3 writeenable
>
>
> >
> > I have made the bootable RL01 image and it works in simH. I have
> > BB-L974F-BC_RSX11M_4.5_BRU64K.tap in place but what kind of tape device
> do
> > I set in simH to attach it? I need to attach prior to booting and the
> > within RSX11/M
> >
> If you’ve set the simH to an 11/
> On Feb 6, 2017, at 6:22 PM, william degnan wrote:
>
> John or anyone...regarding this:
>
>
>>>
>>The v3.2 version I have from bitsavers has the baseline disk a few
>> bytes larger than
>>an RL01 so simH autosized it (incorrectly) to an RL02. Hopefully
>> Mark’s new sizing
>
John or anyone...regarding this:
> >
> The v3.2 version I have from bitsavers has the baseline disk a few
> bytes larger than
> an RL01 so simH autosized it (incorrectly) to an RL02. Hopefully
> Mark’s new sizing
> code should avoid this in the future. To copy an RL01 RSX
>
>
>
> simH did not change the size of the disk image. By default, simH
> will automatically
> detect the type of disk on a particular controller (e.g.
> RL01/RL02, RK06/RK07) based
> on the size of the disk image. When I attached the image and did
> a”sh rl0” it showed up
> On Feb 6, 2017, at 8:35 AM, william degnan wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Mark and John,
>>> Summarizing...The disks in the RL01 directory are 5MB, which is the RL01
>>> disk size I believed, but if they are RL02, why would I not use "RL02" in
>>> the simh commands?
>>>
>>> For example the code Ma
>
>
> >
> > Mark and John,
> > Summarizing...The disks in the RL01 directory are 5MB, which is the RL01
> > disk size I believed, but if they are RL02, why would I not use "RL02" in
> > the simh commands?
> >
> > For example the code Mark wrote with John's changes, should it not be
> rlo2,
> > not
I used Lyle's updated version to show Spacewar on my PDP-8/a during this
weekends retro event "RetroGathering" in Sweden. It works great!
I did two modifications to the code:
1. Use digital IO instead of the switch register so I could use hand
controls to let the audience play the game.
2. Fixed
11 matches
Mail list logo
