Re: 11/44, parts, 11/24, DZ11

2017-02-08 Thread P Gebhardt
Hello Paul, this is sort of unrelated, but it reminded me of asking you, if you will have time in the next months to watch out for the KT11-D board (M7236) and the RK611 cabling (flat cable BC06R-xx and the transition brack 70-12415 (same as for RL01/02)) ? Thank you very much in advance!All the

Re: 11/44, parts, 11/24, DZ11

2017-02-08 Thread P Gebhardt
Apologies to the list for the noise,that message was supposed to be sent directly to Paul and not to the list. Best regards,Pierre --- Pierre's collection of classic computers moved to: http://www.digitalheritage.de

Unidentified (CDC?) panel

2017-02-08 Thread Christian Corti
Hello, amongst other panels and things (CDC 6600 dead start panel, PDP-15 frontpanel) I got this one: http://up.picr.de/28257957bg.jpg I *guess* it also comes from the CDC 6600 but I'm not sure. Can anyone identify it? Christian

Re: Unidentified (CDC?) panel

2017-02-08 Thread william degnan
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Christian Corti < c...@informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> wrote: > Hello, > amongst other panels and things (CDC 6600 dead start panel, PDP-15 > frontpanel) I got this one: > http://up.picr.de/28257957bg.jpg > I *guess* it also comes from the CDC 6600 but I'm not sure. Ca

Re: Unidentified (CDC?) panel

2017-02-08 Thread Adam Sampson
Christian Corti writes: > http://up.picr.de/28257957bg.jpg > I *guess* it also comes from the CDC 6600 but I'm not sure. Can anyone > identify it? Looks very similar to a CDC 160 -- which the 6000 series peripheral processors were based on, so I guess it's a PP front panel? -- Adam Sampson

Re: Unidentified (CDC?) panel

2017-02-08 Thread william degnan
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Adam Sampson wrote: > Christian Corti writes: > > > http://up.picr.de/28257957bg.jpg > > I *guess* it also comes from the CDC 6600 but I'm not sure. Can anyone > > identify it? > > Looks very similar to a CDC 160 -- which the 6000 series peripheral > processors we

Re: Unidentified (CDC?) panel

2017-02-08 Thread Paul Koning
> On Feb 8, 2017, at 9:01 AM, Adam Sampson wrote: > > Christian Corti writes: > >> http://up.picr.de/28257957bg.jpg >> I *guess* it also comes from the CDC 6600 but I'm not sure. Can anyone >> identify it? > > Looks very similar to a CDC 160 -- which the 6000 series peripheral > processors we

Re: Unidentified (CDC?) panel

2017-02-08 Thread Chuck Guzis
On 02/08/2017 05:26 AM, Christian Corti wrote: > Hello, amongst other panels and things (CDC 6600 dead start panel, > PDP-15 frontpanel) I got this one: http://up.picr.de/28257957bg.jpg I > *guess* it also comes from the CDC 6600 but I'm not sure. Can anyone > identify it? Doesn't look like anyth

Re: Unidentified (CDC?) panel

2017-02-08 Thread Tony Duell
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote: > On 02/08/2017 05:26 AM, Christian Corti wrote: >> Hello, amongst other panels and things (CDC 6600 dead start panel, >> PDP-15 frontpanel) I got this one: http://up.picr.de/28257957bg.jpg I >> *guess* it also comes from the CDC 6600 but I'm not

Re: Unidentified (CDC?) panel

2017-02-08 Thread Josh Dersch
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Chuck Guzis wrote: > On 02/08/2017 05:26 AM, Christian Corti wrote: > > Hello, amongst other panels and things (CDC 6600 dead start panel, > > PDP-15 frontpanel) I got this one: http://up.picr.de/28257957bg.jpg I > > *guess* it also comes from the CDC 6600 but I'm

Re: Unidentified (CDC?) panel

2017-02-08 Thread Al Kossow
On 2/8/17 10:12 AM, Josh Dersch wrote: > The switches and the labels look very similar to the ones used on the CDC > 160's front panel. And the 160 was a 12-bit machine. Maybe this was some > sort of an alternate front panel for a 160? > I'm going to guess it is for a 160-G, with 162 tape syn

Re: LMI Lambda?

2017-02-08 Thread Chris Hanson
No. :) I presume you’re working on something related to CADR, LMI Lambda, and TI Explorer emulation. Why not do so in the open? -- Chris > On Feb 5, 2017, at 7:16 PM, Daniel Seagraves wrote: > > Everyone point and laugh; I am ten kinds of stupid. > > Would everyone who isn’t Al pretend you

Odd-looking scope trace on an address line

2017-02-08 Thread Adrian Graham
Hi folks, Clear one problem and hit another is just what I expect to happen with this Executel :) After last weekend's little breakthrough my little machine is now hitting a loop that LOOKS like it's waiting for an RST6.5 interrupt*, but at the same time the A9 line is doing this: http://www.bin

Re: Odd-looking scope trace on an address line

2017-02-08 Thread dwight
How many vo;ts per division are you using? It doesn't look like an issue but with out some reference I don't know what to say. Dwight From: cctalk on behalf of Adrian Graham Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 12:45:23 PM To: Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic

Re: Odd-looking scope trace on an address line

2017-02-08 Thread Holm Tiffe
dwight wrote: > How many vo;ts per division are you using? > > It doesn't look like an issue but with out some reference > > I don't know what to say. > > Dwight Pretty normal. this is nearly perfect high pegel. Regards, Holm -- Technik Service u. Handel Tiffe, www.tsht.de, Holm Tiffe

Re: Odd-looking scope trace on an address line

2017-02-08 Thread Paul Koning
> On Feb 8, 2017, at 4:31 PM, Holm Tiffe wrote: > > dwight wrote: > >> How many vo;ts per division are you using? >> >> It doesn't look like an issue but with out some reference >> >> I don't know what to say. >> >> Dwight > > Pretty normal. > this is nearly perfect high pegel. > > Regards

Re: Odd-looking scope trace on an address line

2017-02-08 Thread Adrian Graham
On 08/02/2017 21:31, "Holm Tiffe" wrote: > dwight wrote: > >> How many vo;ts per division are you using? >> >> It doesn't look like an issue but with out some reference >> >> I don't know what to say. >> >> Dwight > > Pretty normal. > this is nearly perfect high pegel. Yes, ignore me, user

need (physical) key for Sun SPARCserver 1000e

2017-02-08 Thread Jerry Kemp
Its literally Christmas for me today. I came into physical position of a well optioned-out SPARCserver 1000e, accompanied by several SPARC Storage Arrays. I'm doing a physical review of the 1000e, i.e. re-seating boards, physical clean up, etc. And reviewing all the appropriate hardware docu

RE: need (physical) key for Sun SPARCserver 1000e

2017-02-08 Thread Bill Gunshannon
Got a picture of it? I found that old PS/2 keys work in PDP-11 and VAX boxes, might work in the SparcServer, too. (I don't remember any of the Sparcs att he Univerisity having keys but they were old and maybe Sun came up with a reason to add one.) bill

Re: need (physical) key for Sun SPARCserver 1000e

2017-02-08 Thread Jerry Kemp
On 02/ 8/17 06:11 PM, Bill Gunshannon wrote: Got a picture of it? No, I do not. I was literally just gifted with this less than 8 hours ago, and I have what I have. I even hit up several search engines and came up null. I found that old PS/2 keys work in PDP-11 and VAX boxes, might w

RE: need (physical) key for Sun SPARCserver 1000e

2017-02-08 Thread Jay West
Bill wrote... > Got a picture of it? Jerry Replied >No, I do not See http://theor.jinr.ru/~sazonov/guide/sun/ss1000e.png J

Re: need (physical) key for Sun SPARCserver 1000e

2017-02-08 Thread Jerry Kemp
Just a little more info. I was informed that the key I need is part #330-1651 . This key was shared by the SS1000, SC2000, StorEdge L1000, StorEdge L140, StorEdge L400, SPARCstorage Library Model 8/400, 8/140, and possibly other hardware of that vintage. Thanks for looking, Jerry On 02/ 8

Re: need (physical) key for Sun SPARCserver 1000e

2017-02-08 Thread Yvan Janssens
On a misc side note, you might be able to change it with a set of picks/paper clip. Your mileage may vary though. On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 at 05:44, Jerry Kemp wrote: > Just a little more info. > > I was informed that the key I need is part #330-1651 . > > This key was shared by the SS1000, SC2000, St

Re: need (physical) key for Sun SPARCserver 1000e

2017-02-08 Thread Jerry Kemp
Hello Yvan, Thanks for the reply. I did just go try. No luck though. Given that I now have a P/N for the key, and that it was used across a wide assortment of equipment, right now, I'm feeling pretty confident that one will pop up somewhere. Only time will tell. Worse case, maybe its a le