On 12/06/2017 07:30 PM, Paul Berger via cctalk wrote:
> You are welcome glad it is going again it is the very best programmers
> calculator ever made. Mine is just a little newer than yours and still
> going strong. I bought mine new when taking a 370 assembler course.
I bought mine when my TI
On 2017-12-06 11:26 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
On 12/06/2017 07:00 PM, Paul Berger via cctalk wrote:
Well that usually means that there is contamination at the connection
point or the sandwich is not clamped tightly enough. I have cleaned
them off with alcohol and a lint free cloth.
On 12/06/2017 07:00 PM, Paul Berger via cctalk wrote:
> Well that usually means that there is contamination at the connection
> point or the sandwich is not clamped tightly enough. I have cleaned
> them off with alcohol and a lint free cloth. If I remember correctly
> there is not space for you
Well that usually means that there is contamination at the connection
point or the sandwich is not clamped tightly enough. I have cleaned
them off with alcohol and a lint free cloth. If I remember correctly
there is not space for you to get them out of alignment.
Paul.
On 2017-12-06 10:42
Well, I replaced the LCD and was greeted with missing segments. Any
suggestions before I throw in the towel?
That glue from hell necessitated picking off the black plastic shielding
bit by bit with forceps ans a magnifying glass. Really awful stuff.
--Chuck
On 30/11/17 19:46, Philip Pemberton via cctalk wrote:
> It looks like the DIP switches are the same as the 150 - William Degnan
> posted a link to those.
Update -- the DIP switch settings are *not* the same as the 150. I
finally found the 150 Plus settings in an old Usenet post:
On 12/06/2017 02:51 PM, Paul Berger via cctalk wrote:
> Ok I am guessing you have figured out how to take the back off? (screws
> under the rubber feet) with the calculator upside down and the display
> away from you there is a connector at the top right that connects the
> keyboard to the
Ok I am guessing you have figured out how to take the back off? (screws
under the rubber feet) with the calculator upside down and the display
away from you there is a connector at the top right that connects the
keyboard to the electronics on the back of the display carefully lift
that
To everyone who ordered the amazing vintage computer calendars from
us recently - thank you! I trust everyone has received theirs by now
from the first round.
We still have a few left for those interested! Go
the page below:
http://pcmuseum.ca/shop.asp
If you don't want to use
PayPal, we have
On 12/06/2017 01:22 PM, Paul Berger via cctalk wrote:
> I just looked back at the archives of the hpmuseum.org site and the
> donor 12C that the display came from for the 16C I repaired for another
> MoHPC member had a serial number that began with 2224A and was the
> version with the innards
I just looked back at the archives of the hpmuseum.org site and the
donor 12C that the display came from for the 16C I repaired for another
MoHPC member had a serial number that began with 2224A and was the
version with the innards wrapped in black plastic like your 16C.
Paul.
On 2017-12-06
On 12/06/2017 10:10 AM, Tony Duell wrote:
> 'Later' here might mean the modern versions of the 12C, which is very
> different. I thought both types of construction of the original Voyagers
> used the same display but I must admit I have never swapped them over.
Feh, the "old" HP12C that I got
My apologies for the possible double-mailing, it looks like something
went wrong, either with Gmail, my ISP or the mailinglist software, as
my message didn't show up (or only later, after I had posted through
the ‘proper’ web-based Gmail).
- MG
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk
wrote:
> On 12/03/2017 10:00 AM, Tony Duell wrote:
>
>> That sounds like the original version with the separate logic module.
>>
>> I think the display is the same between the 2 versions. I am also
>> pretty sure the
On 12/03/2017 10:00 AM, Tony Duell wrote:
> That sounds like the original version with the separate logic module.
>
> I think the display is the same between the 2 versions. I am also
> pretty sure the same display is used in all the old Voyagers (there
> are annunciators on it that are not used
From: Michael Thompson via cctalk: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 4:59 PM
The paper tape images are here:
http://www.bitsavers.org/bits/DEC/pdp8/papertapeImages/set3/
The RICM also has an original set of the DECUS 8-213 ALGOL paper tapes, but
they are different from the ones on Bitsavers. I need to
On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 09:32:35PM -0500, Pete Rittwage via cctech wrote:
[...]
>
> You should never use one-to-one NAT like that. You should only forward the
> ports you need from the firewall to your server. In this case, I assume
> you only need tcp/23 for telnet from the outside?
Just in
I'm looking after a VAX 4000 for a friend, which has a SCSI Q-bus card
(M5976). If the card did not have the large metal face, would it work in
a Q-bus PDP-11? We are not going to potentially ruin a card by trying
this, but I am interested to know if this is the case.
Thanks,
Aaron.
On Sat, 2 Dec 2017, cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org wrote:
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 20:39:14 -0500
From: william degnan
Thanks I think this is what I need, just disable smtp within MULTINET. As
I said in my OP I prefer a VMS or MULTINET solution free of modern
> I have a microvax set up with VMS 5, running MULTINET (and decnet
> locally). The server has a FQDN and after a while being exposed to the
> WWW someone out there started using the server as an SMTP relay. I can
> disable and clear the queue, but I'd like to block entirely this from
>
I would photocopy them within a few days of them. The paper was still
available into the late 80's but the Hunt brothers with the Silver scam
pretty much killed it. If you kept the printouts
in a binder/drawer they would last quite a long time. I think I still have
some. The 2nd generation Tek
I'm looking after a VAX 4000 for a friend, which has a SCSI Q-bus card
(M5976). If the card did not have the large metal face, would it work in
a Q-bus PDP-11? We are not going to potentially ruin a card by trying
this, but I am interested to know if this is the case.
Thanks,
Aaron.
I have a partial roll but it been outside inside an old hard copy unit for
about 5 years. I need reason you don't see them is they really do have
quite a bit if silver in them. Even in 1976 my employer at the time didn't
care and was doing pretty well of the scrap.
On Dec 2, 2017 6:08 PM, "Randy
Then there is this
http://www.wrpn.emmet-gray.com/
WRPN is an HP16C program, first for (I think) Windows,
and also on Android.
I use both phone and Windows versions;
besides my original 16C, when I'm at my desk.
Keven Miller
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Guzis via cctalk"
If anyone is interested, I documented a fairly easy way to prevent third
party SMTP relaying with MULTINET 4.1 on a VMS 5 MicroVAX.
http://vintagecomputer.net/browse_thread.cfm?id=708
I did cheat a little...I set up an email alias on my modern mail server to
forward messages to a single email
Camiel,
Without sounding super negative (my day job as a security consultant let's
me do that enough...) I would be especially wary of connecting anything
with a 10 year old stack to the modern internet. The range of automatic
attacks based on what the state of the OS was when it was last
I bought my Teletype 37 from them. It was shown as in pretty bad shape and
AS-IS. When I showed them a few pictures of the insides
where parts had been stripped, just to say maybe a few more pictures would
have been helpful. They send me a partial refund. I didn't
even ask for it.
My biggest
On 11/30/17, 9:26 PM, "cctech on behalf of william degnan via cctech"
wrote:
>
> >I have a microvax set up with VMS 5, running MULTINET (and decnet
> >locally). The server has a FQDN and after a while being exposed to the
> >WWW
On 11/30/17, 9:26 PM, "cctech on behalf of william degnan via cctech"
wrote:
>I have a microvax set up with VMS 5, running MULTINET (and decnet
>locally). The server has a FQDN and after a while being exposed to the
>WWW
All –
For those interested in APE (the Altair Peripheral Emulator by
Frank Barberis), I have recovered the site (with his permission) and Jay has
agreed to host it on Classiccmp (thank you Jay!). It can be accessed at
http://ape.classiccmp.org.
No
Is anyone perhaps interested in any of the following?
It's essentially the remainder of some of my earlier offerings.
I took the time to provide some details (that previously may
have been missing)
I intend to clear out the majority of it by mid-December
(around the 15th), after that it will
Is anyone perhaps interested in any of the following?
It's essentially the remainder of some of my earlier offerings.
I took the time to provide some details (that previously may
have been missing)
I intend to clear out the majority of it by mid-December
(around the 15th), after that it will
Is anyone perhaps interested in any of the following?
It's essentially the remainder of some of my earlier offerings.
I took the time to provide some details (that previously may
have been missing)
I intend to clear out the majority of it by mid-December
(around the 15th), after that it will
We just dumped the enhanced character ROMs from a HP2645. 8k bipolar mask ROMs,
90 ns (they need to be fast since they are used as video RAM really). I read
them on the Data IO using their PROM equivalent, AMD 27S181. The microvectors
sets (line set and large character sets) are 9 bits. The 9th
34 matches
Mail list logo