G'day Zane -
Like every other computer system created, the Desktop Generation has its
own set of quirks and wonders. It was an interesting evolutionary
repackage of the microEclipse processor, but I never saw a customer or
user site actually using the Model 10's MS-DOS "compatibility
Thank you Bruce, I took quick look through, and will need to go back and read
up on the hardware bits, Chapter 4 looks like it goes into the stuff I’m
curious about. I’m normally a software guy, but this is one case, where the
hardware is of more interest.
Thanks,
Zane
> On May 21, 2018,
EXCELLENT MANUAL!
ED#
In a message dated 5/21/2018 12:22:40 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
cctalk@classiccmp.org writes:
G'day Zane -
I have placed Desktop Generation information for you at:
www.NovasAreForever.org/tmp/014-000751-00__The_Desktop_Generation__1983-Jul.01.pdf
-
Bruce
G'day Zane -
I have placed Desktop Generation information for you at:
www.NovasAreForever.org/tmp/014-000751-00__The_Desktop_Generation__1983-Jul.01.pdf
-
Bruce Ray
Wild Hare Computer Systems, Inc.
Boulder, Colorado USA
b...@wildharecomputers.com
...preserving the Data General legacy:
catching up late to this thread...what is the power supply rating for a
2000, and if it's dead will removing the battery allow a person to fire it
up or do you have to have a working battery to apply power? I forgot I
have one of these buried in my laptop shelf.
b
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 1:30
>From: Al Kossow
> NASTRAN is available
That's a finite element modeling code, isn't it? (I guess it all depends on
what the OP meant by 'CAD'...)
Noel
Noel Chiappa wrote:
> the original Stanford SUDS is still available, I think.
Yes, it's available from saildart.org.
Message: 20
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 20:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Cisin
>I remember an interview with Lee Felsenstein, in which he was asked how
>much a battery power unit for the upcoming Osborne would weigh. He
>reponded that the external DC connection was currently for
On 5/21/18 6:03 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
> Another old CAD program is NEC2, the antenna (etc.) simulator.
I forgot to post about it here, but NASTRAN is available on github along with a
lot of other NASA code.
https://github.com/nasa/
It is unlikely that the sources ever made it
11/35 vs 40, I think there was some attempt to discriminate between
the two, as the /35 with no added boxes was a great little machine
cost and performance wise, I recall the timing being different when
going through the prints for the two machines, got parts for 35 out of
surplux, checked the
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 03:31:32PM +, Johnny Eriksson via cctalk wrote:
>
> On the other hand, the fight against the X86 architecture might be done
> with the help of arm forces...
Bringing Acorns to a flame war sounds RISCy
:-)
Fred Cisin wrote:
> d) The TRULY IMPORTANT issues will never be solved through the use of
> armed forces:
> big-endian V little-endian
> vi v emacs
> DEC V IBM
> CDC V IBM
> TRS80 V Apple
> Atari V Commodore
> IBM V Apple
> Android V IOS
> Linux V Windoze V MacOS
> number of
Hi,
Waldemar Brodkorb via cctech wrote,
> Hi,
>
> I started to revive an old Micro PDP11/83 I have for over 12 years
> now. It is fully assembled and last time I tried to start the
> machine it some kind of started.
> My biggest issue at the moment is the power supply.
>
> After the machine is
> On May 21, 2018, at 7:52 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk
> wrote:
>
>> From: Randy Dawson
>
>> For a while I have collected bits of legacy CAD
>> ...
>> My question is, did any of the source code for these systems
>> .. ever make it out
>
> Well, not quite what you're
> From: Randy Dawson
> For a while I have collected bits of legacy CAD
> ...
> My question is, did any of the source code for these systems
> .. ever make it out
Well, not quite what you're asking about, I think (it sounds like you're
interested in MechE CAD, not EE, even
15 matches
Mail list logo