Watching all the pictures was a really good experience, especially
considering how many of those items I would never have had the chance of
seeing otherwise.
-Messaggio originale-
Da: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] Per conto di Donald via
cctalk
Inviato: sabato 23 giugno 201
Figure you HP fans will already have seen this, but in case not:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/332695779697
Noel
(x11 terminal) C3253A HP Envizex P-Series
Up for sale is a X-Terminal made by Hewlett Packard in 1995.
Tested, in perfect working conditions!!!
cpu: i960 @ 33Mhz (it's the fastest available on Envizex v1)
ram: 48MB (builtin + 16+16+8, the first two sims need to be equal)
rom: none (sorry, It doe
With the demise of Weirdstuff, I decided to visit Outback Equipment in
Gilroy this week. Jim Schuetz, formerly a partner at Weirdstuff is now
the Business Development Manager at Outback.
While there, I looked over the following DEC gear (includes several
non-DEC QBus cards that I'm not listing -
Thank you for posting the link to all those pictures. It looks like
lots stuff that never made it to your website.
As we all know, too many collectors keep their collections very
private, with very few allowed to see all the fun. I hope the new
owner continues to make the items visible.
--
Will
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Carlo Pisani via cctalk
wrote:
> (x11 terminal) C3253A HP Envizex P-Series
>
> Up for sale is a X-Terminal made by Hewlett Packard in 1995.
>
> Tested, in perfect working conditions!!!
>
> cpu: i960 @ 33Mhz (it's the fastest available on Envizex v1)
> ram: 48MB (bu
Hi folks,
For the last few weeks I’ve been helping the owner of a PPG2.2 synthesizer get
the ‘computer’ side of it, a Waveterm A, running.
The Waveterm is a 6809-based single board computer running FLEX that was
designed to use 8” drives, then at some point they modified it slightly to use
5.2
On 06/23/2018 01:32 PM, Lyle Bickley via cctalk wrote:
There's more "stuff" that you can see from the pictures below. All the
PDP-11 "boxes" and boards look to be good cosmetically.
Photos here:
https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipMAvVBdhz20-z7l6W9JXhBB0k3ggw0HWveHctEup826NNIWPAxUlk1lbW-RY76z
Woohoo! What a collection! And none of it junk! Well done. Let me guess:
staying in the US, East Coast, southern part? In any case, great that you found
an acquirer that could preserve your awesome collecting work. And thanks so
much for sharing the nice photos.
Marc
> On Jun 22, 2018, at 3:34
On 06/23/2018 02:17 PM, Adrian Graham via cctalk wrote:
> All the disk images for the Waveterm have been created using programs
> written by PPG users. For some reason any disk we wrote with them
> wouldn’t read correctly in the machine itself UNTIL we made a new
> image of that disk using Teledis
All the disk images for the Waveterm have been created using programs
written by PPG users. For some reason any disk we wrote with them
wouldn’t read correctly in the machine itself UNTIL we made a new
image of that disk using Teledisk 2.15 then re-wrote it back to the
same floppy. My question is
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> All the disk images for the Waveterm have been created using programs
>>> written by PPG users. For some reason any disk we wrote with them
>>> wouldn’t read correctly in the machine itself UNTIL we made a new
What kind of drives does the Waveterm use?
What kind of disk controller?
For example:
96tpi (80 tracks per side) drives can read 48tpi (40 tracks per side)
disks, and can write them to virgin disks, but, when RE-writing them,
leave part of the old (wide) track alongside. Those RE-written dis
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 1:10 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 3:30 PM, Adrian Graham via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
>> Wow, good spot! This one isn’t badged but we just assumed it had fallen
>> off. Just as I’m typing this he’s messaged me to say it’s actually the
>
On 06/23/2018 04:53 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
> I had hoped that Chuck would have an answer.
>
> If you have two disks that are nominally the same, and one works and the
> other doesn't, then there is obviously something different.
>
> If the sector contents are the same, then the next st
15 matches
Mail list logo
